 |
| The Boston Bombers: Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. There's something "missing" from the Boston bombing story. But the FBI and members of big media won't say a word. |
"There are gaping holes in the story about the largest terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11"
Stop and think about it for a moment. We have the New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, Time Magazine, Newsweek, NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS and MSNBC, just to name a few. Then there's the myriad of websites from conservative to progressive. Taken together these "news organizations" have millions of dollars at their disposal and can field hundreds of professional investigators and journalists to independently look into this and any other story. But they don't. The question is: Why don't they? The answer seems simple enough: The big media outlets are often owned by members of the very same clique that would be the subject of any investigation. And big-time journalists are not going to risk their cushy jobs and positions on the "big stage" by chasing a story that might seriously challenge power. So they sit in silence and watch innocent people die while they help perpetuate the super lie that passes for "freedom and democracy" in America.
By Russ Baker
An exclusive WhoWhatWhy investigation has found serious factual inconsistencies in accounts provided by the only witness to the alleged confession of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.
Why does this matter? Because this witness is the sole source for the entire publicly accepted narrative of who was behind the bombing and its aftermath—and why these events occurred.
In case we’ve forgotten how convoluted and murky the story initially seemed, let’s recall how:
-Tamerlan Tsarnaev, on a US security watch list since 2011 after the Russians provide a warning to American intelligence, goes overseas and allegedly exhibits further problematic behavior.
-In April, 2013, a savage attack is unleashed at the Boston Marathon, disrupting an iconic American event. Innocent people lose limbs and lives, America is traumatized anew, and a large American city is “locked” down” while normal processes and procedures are abandoned. We are told that Tsarnaev and his younger brother are responsible for all this–and for the cold-blooded execution of a campus police officer several days later.
_______________
How does the 'Deep State' get away with murder? Because journalists in big media
and elected officials across the political spectrum play along,
and elected officials across the political spectrum play along,
as this video clip demonstrates.
From the new documentary, Counter-Intelligence.
_______________
Yet our sense of certainty that the Tsarnaevs did this—and did it alone, with no one else, including America’s security apparatus, knowing a thing—is actually dependent largely on the say-so of one person, one witness.
Thus, the problems we have uncovered with the witness’s testimony (as represented by law enforcement) now raise questions about almost everything concerning what has been described as the largest terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11.
Truth and Its Pants
As the classic saying goes, “A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.” That is perhaps even more true in these days of Twitter and Facebook and instant blogging. When a big news story breaks, the first reports are often rife with misinformation based on a combination of innocent mistakes, sloppiness, conjecture, and poor communication. Yet it’s also true that during those first 24 hours pieces of inconvenient truth may emerge that will soon be denied or even suppressed as the messy facts get neatly fashioned into an “official story.”
Such was the case with the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy: sheriff’s deputies converging on the Texas School Book Depository in Dallas reported finding an entirely different type of gun than the one ultimately said to have been the murder weapon. And doctors at Parkland Hospital claimed initially that a shot had hit President Kennedy from the front, before they were told in no uncertain terms that they were mistaken, and a narrative formed around all the shots coming from behind—and only from the Depository.
Truth seekers know, from experience, to pay close attention to how a narrative changes in the first hours, days and weeks following an event of significance. And nowhere would that be truer than when the source of the changing story is the principal witness.
Read More
No comments:
Post a Comment