Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text
Survivor of US Drone Attack:
Obama Belongs on List of World's Tyrants

Poisoning Black Cities: Corporate Campaign to Ethnically Cleanse US Cities Massive Marches in Poland
Against Authoritarian Threat of Far-Right
Ethiopia’s Invisible Crisis: Land Rights Activists Kidnapped and Tortured

Global Perspectives Now Global Perspectives Now

Redskins' Trademark Was Canceled by the Trademark Office — Court Upholds Cancellation

Washington Redskins helmet: Imagine if the team was called "The Jews" and the
helmet featured a caricature of a man wearing a yamaka. (Photo by Keith Allison)

By LORRAINE BAILEY
Finding the term undoubtedly disparaging to Native Americans, a federal judge affirmed the cancelation Wednesday of the Washington Redskins' trademarks.

Last year, the U.S. Trademark Office ruled that the Washington Redskins cannot keep the trademarks behind its football franchise because the name is "disparaging to Native Americans."

RELATED STORY: Change Redskins' Racist Name — 50 Senators Say to NFL

Five Native Americans led by Amanda Blackhorse had brought the challenge in 2006, seeking to nullify six of Pro-Football Inc.'s trademarks: five associated with the team and the fifth with its NFL cheerleaders, the Redskinettes.

Federal law prohibits trademarks that "may disparage" people or "bring them into contempt, or disrepute."

A trademark can be canceled on these grounds only if it was considered disparaging at the time it was filed, which in this case was 1967.

RELATED STORY: Spinning Racism - Redskins Paying Team Of Republican Advisers For Advice On Name Controversy

U.S. District Judge Gerald Lee in Alexandria, Va., affirmed the Trademark Office's ruling Wednesday.

"The court finds that Blackhorse defendants have shown by a preponderance of the evidence that there is no genuine issue of material facts as to the 'may disparage' claim: the record evidence shows that the term 'redskin,' in the context of Native Americans, was offensive," the 70-page decision states.

Lee noted that, 70 years prior to the mark's registration, a dictionary definition for the word "redskin" characterized the word as "often contemptuous."

Numerous books and journals describe the term as offensive and "derogatory" prior to 1967 as well, and the National Congress of American Indians petitioned for the team's name to be changed as early as 1972, according to the ruling.

Skeptical of the team's proffered dichotomy of "mainstream" versus "avant-garde" Native Americans, Lee cited several instances of Native Americans using the term "redskins" for their own sports teams and as a nickname.

"It is indisputable that those with 'non-mainstream' views on whether a term is disparaging can certainly constitute a substantial composite of a reference group," Lee said.

Though many individual Native Americans may not find the term disparaging, Lee said the team's challengers did not need a majority.

The decision expressly notes that it has no effect on the team's use of the word, or whether the Redskins must change their name.

Read More

No comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...