Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text
Survivor of US Drone Attack:
Obama Belongs on List of World's Tyrants

Poisoning Black Cities: Corporate Campaign to Ethnically Cleanse US Cities Massive Marches in Poland
Against Authoritarian Threat of Far-Right
Ethiopia’s Invisible Crisis: Land Rights Activists Kidnapped and Tortured

Global Perspectives Now Global Perspectives Now
Showing posts with label narco terrorists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label narco terrorists. Show all posts

American 'Drug Enforcement' Agents (DEA) Engage in Sex Parties Paid for by Drug Cartels — That's Your 'War on Drugs'

Photo by Brett Neilson.

By Lindsay Dunsmuir
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents had alleged "sex parties" with prostitutes over several years, said a report published on Thursday and stemming from a review of allegations of misconduct by several DEA agents in Colombia.

The alleged parties were funded by local drug cartels, said the report by the Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General, an agency internal watchdog.

The report raised concerns about inadequate reporting of allegations of misconduct and sexual harassment by several law enforcement agencies, including the DEA, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S. Marshals Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

Among the DEA allegations, 10 agents - an assistant regional director and nine special agents - had the alleged sex parties "at government-leased headquarters," and three of the special agents "were provided money, expensive gifts, and weapons from drug cartel members," according to the report.

After investigation, seven of the agents admitted attending the parties, and were suspended for between two and 10 days.

One special agent was cleared of all wrongdoing, the report said. None of the agents was named in the report.

The inspector general said it investigated allegations of sexual harassment and sexual misconduct between October 2008 and September 2012. The Office of the Inspector General declined to confirm where the alleged "sex parties" took place.

The DEA declined to comment.

Read More

Narco Terrorists Now Using Drones To Bring Drugs Into US: Drone Crashes With 6 Pounds of Cyrstal Meth Near Border

Screen capture from CNN video.
By Nick Valencia
A smuggler's drone flying from Mexico crash-landed just south of the U.S. border city of San Ysidro, California, in a failed drug delivery this week, the Tijuana Municipal Police said.

The incident showed that smugglers aren't just going underground any more, using tunnels beneath the U.S.-Mexico border to transport drugs and migrants.

Now the smugglers are trying to do business by air, too, in unmanned aerial vehicles.

The drone was loaded with more than 6 pounds of the synthetic drug crystal meth, Tijuana police said.
RELATED STORY: Mexican Cartels Are Worse Than ISIS — Big Media Hides This -- To Demonize Muslims And Coverup What's Happening On America's Border
The drone crashed Tuesday night in a supermarket parking lot in Tijuana.

Apparently the smugglers became too greedy, authorities said.

The silver and black, six-propeller Spreading Wings S900 model was not able to withstand the weight of the load and crashed, police said.

Read More

Things Everyone Needs to Know About Mexico's Drug War Violence: America is Protecting, Arming and Abetting Drug Cartels

Among the issues: the U.S. military and intelligence collaborates with and empowers a corrupt narco-state in Mexico.

A former Juarez police officer lies dead behind the wheel of his car in morning rush hour after gunmen assassinated him along a main road in Juarez, Mexico.

By Michael Wilson
We need this list. In order to do anything, we need to know certain things, and our implication in them. But first, it is important to clarify that there's a lot more to Mexico than violence. Yes, it is in desperate need of a course reversal, but it would be problematic to construct it as a place that needs rescuing. Rather, we must think of it as a place with much cultural and ecological diversity and beauty, with much to offer the world. And like any other place, it is a place that deserves dignity and peace.

So, I think the question shouldn't be between, "Poor Mexico, when will the international community save it?" and "Damned neo-imperialism; won't they ever leave Mexico alone?" Rather, I think the point is to show that we are in the worst possible limbo somewhere in between, where:

(1) The Mexican and U.S. tax payers pay billions of dollars for the drug war, mainly to military contractors, to no avail and creating no improvement for either country’s national security. As Musa al-Gharbi wrote for Al Jazeera:

“In 2013 drug cartels murdered more than 16,000 people in Mexico alone, and another 60,000 from 2006 to 2012 — a rate of more than one killing every half hour for the last seven years. What is worse, these are estimates from the Mexican government, which is known to deflate the actual death toll by about 50 percent.”
(2) The U.S. military and intelligence collaborates with and empowers a corrupt narco-state in Mexico.
(3) The DEA collaborated with the Sinaloa Cartel, providing them with support such as visas and legal access to move drugs into the U.S., including inside of a cocaine-packed 747 cargo plane, in exchange for "intel” on the other cartels.

(4) The CIA distributed U.S. weapons to cartels (allegedly to "track" the guns, although it is believed this is meant to help it fight the rogue and ruthless Zetas cartel, which was started by former members of the Mexican army’s special forces also trained in counterinsurgency tactics by the U.S. army in Fort Bragg, Georgia).

(5) Corruption is not only in the public sector: even the giant Walmart allegedly bribed its way through the Mexican bureaucracy. Meanwhile, the world’s big banks help launder money for the cartels, who rack in profits to the tune of more than $40b each year.

(6) With that kind of money, the narcos can, and do, purchase police chiefs, entire departments, and higher levels of the state—both within Mexico and increasingly, in cities across the U.S. (not to mention, in scores of other countries: the narcos have at least attempted to infiltrate crime webs in places including Peru and Australia).

(7) The Mexican government does not prosecute more than 93.8% of reported crimes(perhaps because it is difficult to find a politician, at any level of government, in any part of the country, who is not in deep collusion with organized crime or at least with big business).

(8) And while the population gets scared to death at incessant violence, the state pushes the structural and economic reforms to open the country for business, such as removing protections and standards, as well as using the armed forces and other thugs to silence resistance.

(9) Which is partly why the immigration crisis only increases, flooding the U.S. labor market with easily exploitable labor and filling U.S. for-profit prisons.
(10) And finally: there's a lot that people in both Mexico and the US can do:  
  • When elections come around, make sure your would-be representatives know that your vote will be strictly conditioned on their concrete actions to pressure for a change (for example, through aid, trade, and diplomatic sanctions, etc.).
  • Organize collectively, wherever you are: talk to your neighbors, set up events, hold vigils and rallies, attend information sessions, gather speakers, host potlucks and letter-writing campaigns, distribute leaflets with calls to action, visit your government representatives, etc.
  • Boycott companies that benefit from the ongoing violence.
  • Share news and information about it to keep people engaged and organized.
What else do you think we can do? Please feel free to comment and share this.

Enough! — Mexico Is Ready to Explode

Mexico has exploded a long time ago. America's corporate media has been asleep at the wheel.—Ronald David Jackson


A woman protests the then president of Mexico, Felipe Calderón. (Photo by Eneas De Troya)
A woman protests the then president of Mexico, Felipe Calderón. (Photo by Eneas De Troya)

By
Mexico has been profoundly shaken by atrocities and high-level corruption in Guerrero. The earthquake's epicenter is Iguala, the state's third largest city.

Fifty thousand marchers thronged Mexico City's main avenues last Wednesday, and demonstrations took place all over the country. More than 80 delegates to the Inter-University Assembly have called for a nationwide halt to all educational activities on Nov. 5, and are asking other social groups to join them. Protesters set fire to state headquarters in Chilpancingo, Guerrero's capital, and are sacking supermarkets and shopping centers.

Here are the events that sparked the earthquake:

On Sept. 26, María de los Ángeles Pineda Villa, wife of Iguala's Mayor José Luis Abarca, of the left-leaning Party of the Democratic Revolution, was in the main square giving a speech about her accomplishments as head of the municipal social services agency, and it was rumored that she would announce her candidacy to succeed her husband as mayor in next June's election, since she is also a state PRD official.

Just as she was beginning, two busloads of students from the notoriously radical rural teachers' college in nearby Ayotzinapa, who had come to town to raise money to supplement their meager 50 peso daily allowance, headed for Iguala's central square. According to the Federal Attorney General's Office, the mayor ordered the local police chief to stop them. After a minor clash with police the students "borrowed" three buses from the local bus station to return to Ayotzinapa and later travel to this year's march in Mexico City commemorating the October 2, 1968 massacre in Tlatelolco, and were driving out of town when they were sprayed with machine gun fire by police and gunmen from the Guerrero Unidos (United Warriors) cartel.

Three students died, as well as a soccer player in a bus bringing a third division team to town that was also fired on, a taxi driver and his female passenger. One student who panicked and ran off when his classmates were rounded up by police and gang members was later found dead, his eyes gouged out and face flensed with a box cutter, in an act of gratuitous violence. Forty-three students were bundled into police cars and have disappeared.

Pineda's family had been working with the Beltrán Leyva, Sinaloa and Guerreros Unidos cartels for years, two of her brothers were gunned down in gang violence, another served time in jail, and a recently captured leader of Guerreros Unidos identified her as "the key operator" of criminal activity in and around Iguala. The Abarcas have not been seen since the mayor hastily requested a leave of absence, and perhaps they are already in one of the burial pits.Official statements that the 38 bodies found so far in 10 makeshift mass graves are not the students have exacerbated rather than calmed public anger, as now the other question is, who are these trussed up, tortured, headless or charred corpses? Will there be an investigation to find the perpetrators? Or will time be allowed to pass until public indignation subsides, and these cases will join the roughly 98 percent of unsolved homicides in the country that have been swept under a rug as high as the Pico de Orizaba, Mexico's tallest mountain?

Read More

The Faces of Mexico's Missing Students

Faces of Mexico's Missing Students


By BBC Trending
On 26 September, a coach of male students from Ayotzinapa teacher training college in southern Mexico were on their way to protest over school hiring practices. They were stopped by police who shot at their buses; three were killed. But there is a mystery around 43 others, who have not been heard from since - with speculation police may have handed them over to local militia or a drug cartel.

The story has moved the Mexican public, with protest marches by thousands, desperate to know the truth. Now, more than 200 artists from across the country have added their voices, and their talents, to those calling for answers. Using the hashtag #IlustradoresConAyotzinapa (#IllustratorsForAyotzinapa), they are painting portraits of the missing individuals. Many of these images are going viral, and the hashtag has now been used over 14,000 times.

Valeria Gallo's portrait
Valeria Gallo's portrait
Valeria Gallo is one of those artists disillusioned by her government's handling of the incident. She has a son, and told BBC Trending she does not want him growing up in a Mexico where kidnappings and murder are accepted by society. At random she chose one of the missing students, Benjamin Ascencio, drew him and posted it on a Tumblr page. She then called on her peers to follow suit . "I think when you paint someone´s portrait, he´s no longer an unknown," she says. "He has a name, a face. He becomes a person." In a country where reprisals are common, she says getting so many people to sit down and draw was not easy. "Some people were afraid," she says, "but now we can go out and shout, and demand answers".

Another illustrator, known by the name Bef, is one of those that heeded the call. He chose to draw 21-year-old Bernardo Alcaraz - and above the image he wrote: "I, Bef, want to know what happened to Bernardo Flores Alcaraz". He told BBC Trending it is his "obligation" to get involved because "government-run media outlets are helping to hide the truth". He says social media protests are now the "only option" and each drawing is making a "powerful statement".

Read More

Mexican Cartels Are Worse Than ISIS: Big Media Hides This -- To Demonize Muslims And Coverup What's Happening On America's Border

Nothing you've seen ISIS do in Iraq or Syria is worse than what Mexico's drug cartels (narco-terrorists) have been  doing everyday in Mexico. In fact, one could argue that the ISIS madmen were taught everything they know by Mexico's cartels. From 2006 to 2012 the drug war has taken 60,000 lives in Mexico — 16,000 in 2013 alone. ISIS has done nowhere near that level of carnage - Yet.

A Crucified Man: Yes, the cartels do that in Mexico. Long before ISIS was doing it in Iraq.
A Crucified Man: Yes, the cartels do that in Mexico. Long before ISIS was doing it in Iraq.


WARNING:
The images that accompany the article you about to read are extremely graphic and some may even find them disturbing. They depict scenes of extreme violence and brutality and should only be viewed by adults.

By clicking READ ARTICLE you certify that you are 18 years of age or over (if the age of maturity is higher in your state, province or country, then you certify that you are of said age or older), and you further certify that you are not offended by such materials and that you are intentionally and knowingly seeking access to them
for your own personal viewing.

If you do not meet these requirements, or do not agree with them, then
you do not have permission to view this content and must
click on RETURN TO HOMEPAGE now.



RETURN TO HOMEPAGE                READ ARTICLE


Mexico's Failed State: 43 Missing Students, A Mass Grave and A Suspect — Mexico’s Police

Mass grave in Mexico: It is believed to contain some of the missing students. (Screen capture from YouTube video)
Mass grave in Mexico: It is believed to contain some of the missing students. (Screen capture from YouTube video)


By Randal C. Archibold
They were farm boys who did well in school and took one of the few options available beyond the backbreaking work in the corn and bean fields of southern Mexico: enrolling in a local teachers college with a history of radicalism but the promise of a stable classroom job.

Leonel Castro, 19, the oldest of seven siblings, vowed to use his salary to help his impoverished family. Júlio César, 19, thought he could run a school one day and ensure the best for the next generation. Adán Abraham de la Cruz, 23, wanted to put his computer skills to good use in the classroom.


“He was just preparing himself to get ahead like any young person would do,” said Mr. de la Cruz’s father, Bernabé.

Now, they are among 43 students reported missing after deadly clashes with the police on Sept. 26, when at least six student protesters and bystanders were killed in the restive, rural state of Guerrero, one of the poorest in the country and long afflicted by political, social and criminal upheaval.

The state prosecutor investigating why the police opened fire on students from their vehicles has found mass graves in Iguala — the small industrial city where the confrontations occurred — containing 28 badly burned and dismembered bodies.

The prosecutors had already arrested 22 police officers after the clashes, saying the officers secretly worked for, or were members of, a local gang. Now they are investigating whether the police apprehended the students after the confrontation and deliberately turned them over to the local gang. Two witnesses in custody told prosecutors that the gang then killed the protesters on the orders of a leader known as El Chucky.

Read More

High Tech Tunnels on the Mexico-US Border Suggest 'Threat of Terrorism' in the US is a Myth That Helps Keep the Military-Intelligence Complex Fat and Rich

Another tunnel recently discovered on the Mexican-United States border (Screen
capture from YouTube video)

If there's an authentic threat from Islamic terrorism, why haven't these terrorist used such tunnels—or even the overland human smuggling routes—to enter the United States via Mexico to cause havoc? Simple: Perhaps there is no threat from terrorism. Maybe the so-called "terrorist threat" is a myth that helps to keep the military-intelligence complex swimming in cash and the American citizenry blanketed by all-encompassing surveillance. In fact, most of the "terrorist conspiracies" within the United States were either initiated by the FBI itself during dozens of entrapment operations, or "homegrown" terrorism emanating from white supremacists. —Ronald David Jackson

By AP
Two drug-smuggling tunnels with rail systems stretching hundreds of yards across the U.S.-Mexico border were discovered by law enforcement officials, and a 73-year-old woman was charged with helping run one operation, federal authorities said Friday.

No contraband was found in connection with the tunnels, which linked warehouses in Tijuana, Mexico, and the Otay Mesa area of San Diego, according to a statement from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations.
The first tunnel, stretching about 600 yards, was discovered Tuesday. It was described as being equipped with lighting, a crude rail system and wooden trusses.

The entrance on the U.S. side is inside a warehouse where a cement cap covered a 70-foot shaft. A pulley system was installed to hoist goods into the building, which was filled with children's toys and boxes of televisions.

The other tunnel, located Thursday, stretches more than 700 yards and was built with more sophisticated features including a multi-tiered electric rail system and ventilation equipment.

Read More

'El Chapo' and El Banco: Stories About The Capture of Top Mexican Drug Trafficker Ignore How Big Banks Laundered His Money

Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman
By Janine Jackson
US media are celebrating the arrest of alleged Mexican drug kingpin Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán Loera, whose Sinaloa Cartel is thought to be the most powerful trafficker in the world and "a main combatant in a spasm of violence that has left tens of thousands dead in Mexico" (New York Times, 2/22/14).

US Attorney General Eric Holder called the arrest a "landmark achievement": "The criminal activity Guzman allegedly directed contributed to the death and destruction of millions of lives across the globe through drug addiction, violence and corruption."

But that activity wasn't conducted by Guzman alone, and another notable player appears to be missing from the current story.

In 2012, banking corporation HSBC agreed to forfeit $1.256 billion and enter into a deferred prosecution agreement with the Justice Department for violating myriad laws by, among other things, laundering money for drug cartels, including Sinaloa.

HSBC HQ in London
(photo: Danesman1/Wikimedia)


"As a result of HSBC Bank USA's AML [anti-money laundering] failures, at least $881 million in drug trafficking proceeds–including proceeds of drug trafficking by the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico and the Norte del Valle Cartel in Colombia–were laundered through HSBC Bank USA," reads a December 11, 2012 statement from the Department of Justice, which called the bank's failures "stunning," "astonishing" and "blatant."

Indeed, as Reuters (12/11/12) reported, based on federal court documents and prosecutors' statements:

In February 2008, Mexican authorities told the CEO of HSBC's Mexico unit that a local drug lord referred to the bank as the "place to launder money," US prosecutors said…

So rampant was the practice…that on some days drug traffickers deposited hundreds of thousands of dollars at HSBC Mexico accounts. To speed things along, the criminals even designed 'specially shaped boxes' that fit the size of teller windows at HSBC branches, according to the documents.

But while the only questions regarding Guzman's prosecution appear to be where and when, things were different when it came to prosecuting the institution that supported what Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton called "the lifeblood of their operations."

The DOJ "stopped short of indicting HSBC," as the New York Times phrased it (3/1/13) because, according to Justice Department prosecutor Lanny Breuer, there were other considerations:

Had the US authorities decided to press criminal charges, HSBC would certainly have lost its banking license in the US, the future of the institution would have been under threat and the entire banking system would have been destabilized.

Judging by coverage, media bought that line (Extra!, 1/14).

For its part, HSBC declared itself "profoundly sorry" for "past mistakes."

Media's elision of the bank's role from current reporting on Sinoloa suggests they bought that one, too.



Reprinted with permission from Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting.


Mexico: Terror and “Terrorism”

A woman at an anti-violence demonstration in Mexico City
Real fears--a woman at an anti-violence demonstration in Mexico City. (Flickr / Oscar
Ocelotl Aguirre. Some rights reserved)
A little-noticed security reform in Mexico threatens a major erosion of liberty by exploiting public fear to introduce a sweeping definition of “terrorism”.

By Alejandro Garcia de la Garza
On February 11, the Mexican Senate approved reform of the laws concerning terrorism. The bill will soon reach the desk of the president, Enrique Peña Nieto, to be ratified—a likely outcome, since he initiated the proposal last June.

The reform envisages jail terms of 15 to 40 years and fines from 27,000 to 80,000 pesos (roughly US$2,045 to $6056) for those who use chemical, biological or radioactive weapons or arms of any other kind to carry out acts that seek to generate fear among the population. The bill states that this punishment will be applied to those who “intentionally commit actions affecting public or private goods or services against the physical or emotional integrity of people, or their lives, that cause alarm, fear or terror in the population or in a group or sector of the population, that threaten national security or pressure the authorities or individuals to make a determination.” If the so-called terrorist attack affects publicly accessible property or the national economy or if hostages are taken, the penalty will be increased by half.

A linked proposal to eliminate article 139 of the Federal Penal Code raises fear of abuses. It currently stipulates that “manifestations made by social groups in the exercise of human, social or constitutional rights, which do not threaten the rights or property of people or that do not have a purpose to pressure the authorities to make a determination in a particular way over a demand, shall not be considered as terrorist actions.”

Criminalised

The two leftist political parties in Mexico, the PRD and PT, have been the only groups to oppose the reform. Among their concerns was a fear that legitimate social protests and manifestations could be criminalised under the pretext of security. The language used does not make a clear distinction between those with a legitimate right to protest and terrorists.

Now back in office after 12 years, President Peña Nieto’s party, the PRI—or Institutional Revolutionary Party—ruled Mexico for over 70 years in what was called “the perfect dictatorship”. Dispersing social manifestations was a favoured tool for persecuting opposition and old fears of uncontested PRI power have resurfaced. But the reform may be a way to gain favour with Mexico’s northern partners and Peña Nieto met the US president, Barack Obama, and the Canadian prime minister, Stephen Harper, on February 19 in Toluca.

Many Mexicans had expected the Obama administration to take a more sympathetic position on migration. Far from it: according to the Mexican National Institute on Migration, 2013 saw over 333,000 Mexicans deported from the US. The relationship between the two countries has been tainted not only by the unregulated movement of people across the border but by the trafficking of drugs from Mexico—and of American guns, coming the other way, with which the drug cartels have been arming themselves.

During the summit, Obama’s focus was on increasing co-operation among Canada, the US and Mexico to increase prosperity and commerce in the region. While energy reform was one of the main areas of focus, security also played an important role, with Obama saying that reforms were urgent but co-operation was excellent.

The language used does not make a clear distinction between those with a legitimate right to protest and terrorists.

Yet while the “war on drugs” is being fought in Mexico (and across Latin America) under strict instructions and financing from the US, the latter is simultaneously the major consumer of drugs and the biggest exporter of weapons. At the same time and in sharp contradiction, there is a trend towards legalisation of marijuana at state level in the US.

The “war on terror” similarly has quite different resonances in the two neighbours, from the way it is fought to who the “enemy” is supposed to be. With such a vague definition in the Mexican security reform, the new law could be used to advance political agendas, suppress social manifestations, persecute opposition parties or individuals and silence critics. A different and clearer definition of the challenge is required for a country plagued by cartel violence, where murder, extortion and public displays of violence are a daily occurrence.

Mexicans lives in a constant state of terror—where rivals and victims of the cartels are found tortured and dismembered, where the police and military are responsible for human-rights abuses and where civilian groups have taken up arms to protect themselves. It’s just not the one addressed in the new law.



Reprinted with permission from openDemocracy.

Murder and Mexico’s Security Dilemma


Why is Mexico mired in organized, drug-related murder? In an extreme case of security dilemmas increasingly familiar elsewhere, the state has ceded its monopoly of legitimate force to irregular security companies—and is now considering legitimizing vigilante groups.


Journalists protest against cartel violence in Mexico, 2010
Murders, disappearances ... justice?: a 2010 protest against drug-cartel violence against
journalists in Mexico. (Photo by John S and James L Knight)

Is the government losing its authority? All around the world, little by little, the state has been transferring security functions to private firms, which have presented themselves as experts providing specialized services in intelligence, training and analysis. In Mexico, with cartel violence and corruption running rampant, security has come to be conceived as best handled by professionals outside the authorities, with bodyguards ensuring the safety of their patrons.

With only one police officer for every 996 Mexicans, private security has boomed. Since 2008 the industry has been growing by a steady 20 per cent per year and by 2012 there were more than 8,000 firms. Over three quarters operate irregularly or even illegally, to avoid taxes or having to pay for permits and certificates. They profit by exploiting the deteriorating situation rather than providing a reliable service. They have filled their ranks with ex-cops and people with little education, who find in this industry a job opportunity with few requirements.

The Lockerbie Bombing Hoax: Governments & Big Media Told Decades of Lies About The Bombing of Pam Am Flight 103

Photo: Pan Am Flight 103 Memorial - Plaque - Arlington National Cemetery
Pan Am Flight 103 Memorial - Plaque - Arlington National Cemetery.
(Photo by Tim Evanson)

"I cannot accept blood money
when I know that the Libyans are not involved”
-Matt Berkeley, relative of a Pam Am Flight 103 bombing victim, on why his family won't accept
the cash settlement agreed to by the Libyan government.


By Ronald David Jackson
From almost the moment of the downing of Pam Am Flight 103 by a sophisticated time bomb over Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988, the finger of blame was pointed at Libya and the government of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi. Led by the United States, governments of the West accused Libya of involvement in the bombing and the corporate media followed right along. The charade continued for decades and culminated with the imposition of crippling sanctions and diplomatic isolation on Libya; the families of those killed being lied to, manipulated, and exploited, and an innocent man being arrested, put on trial, convicted, vilified and hounded to his death bed.

The West Blames Libya
In 1992, after a four-year blizzard of anti-Libya/anti-Arab propaganda, the UN voted to impose sanctions against Libya. Part of the global puppet show required that Libya hand over an alleged perpetrator, Abdel Basset Al-Megrahi, who was placed on trial at a Scottish court in the Netherlands where he was convicted and jailed in 2001. Sanctions against Libya were finally lifted in 2003—after a decade—when the government of Libya capitulated to international blackmail and agreed to pay up to $10 million to each of the 270 victims of the bombing.

Photo: Pan Am Flight 103 Memorial Cairn - Arlington  National Cemetery
Pan Am Flight 103 Memorial Cairn - Arlington
National Cemetery. The memorial lists the name of
victims at its base. (Photo by Cliff)
Every year, around the anniversary of the bombing (December 21), governments and corporate media re-start the propaganda parade, telling the world the "Libya-did-the-Lockerbie-bombing-and-the-perpetrator got-away" story all over again.

The United States government—and many other governments and corporate media entities—have been involved in a coverup of the key facts surrounding the bombing of Pam Am Flight 103.  The question is, why?

The Trial Was A Sham
The Chief Prosecutor in the Lockerbie trial, Britain's Lord Hardie, shocked the world when he resigned just weeks before the trial was to begin. At the time it was suggested Hardie rather resign than go further with a case that was thoroughly lacking in sufficient evidence and get caught "holding the parcel." A suggestion Hardie denied. Belief in the trial and conviction began to wane when witnesses insisted they never made statements attributed to them by investigators, and a key forensic witness against Al-Megrahi, admitted to lying and other deceptions during the Lockebie trial, including going so far as stealing a key piece of evidence and giving it to criminal investigators.

Al-Megrahi was ultimately granted a new trial on appeal in 2009. By this time the Scottish government no longer believed in Al-Megrahi's guilt. Al-Megrahi had always insisted on his innocence but was allowed to drop the appeal and return to die in Libya (he was gravely ill by the time he won his appeal).



Despite questions about his trial, and despite the fact that he was freed by the Scottish government and allowed to return to Libya, the chorus of "Libya was involved, and Al-Megrahi did the bombing" continued unabated. As part of the cruel charade, the United States asked the Western-backed rebels who had just overthrown the Libyan government and executed Muammar Gaddafi to "re-examine" the Al-Megrahi case. "This is a guy with blood on his hands, the lives of innocents," said State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland back in August of 2011. For the most part, the corporate media and US government never bothered to fully inform the gullible public about the facts of the sham trial.

Scotland Knew Al-Megrahi Was Innocent
In March of 2012 (11 years after Al-Megrahi's original conviction and three years after he won the right to a new trial), a Scottish newspaper published a report on the Lockerbie bombing that had been kept secret for five years by the government of Scotland. The full 861-page report was published by the Sunday Herald with the permission of Al-Megrahi. The newspaper admitted that it had "chosen to publish the full report online today to allow the public to see for themselves the analysis of the evidence which could have resulted in the acquittal of Megrahi." The newspaper went on to state that  "the report adds weight to calls for a full public inquiry into the atrocity – something for which many of the relatives have been campaigning for more than two decades."

The blockbuster report was all but ignored by the Western media and governments like the United States.

Photo: Abdel Basset Al-Megrahi on his death bed.
Abdel Basset Al-Megrahi was hounded by questions about
the Lockerbie bombing even on his death bed. Tribune's caption calls
Al-Megrahi the "convicted Lockerbie bomber" but doesn't point out
that his trial was a sham.
(Screen capture from video, Telegraph, UK)

Pam Am Investigator Raised Questions About Libya's Involvement Early On
Long before the revelation of the report by the Scottish government, the results of an investigation on the Lockerbie bombing surfaced. The investigation was conducted by Interfor (also known as Interforce), a private intelligence contractor which bills itself as an "international investigation firm." Founded by "ex-Mossad agent" Juval Aviv, Interfor was commissioned by Pam Am after Pam Am and its insurance company was sued for negligence (letting the bomb on the plane) by victims' families.

The Interfor report exposed a tangled web of suspects that included a Syrian drug trafficker linked to Major General Richard Secord (Secord had become famous for his association with Colonel Oliver North and the Iran-Contra "Cocaine for Guns" fiasco. The secret operation by the Reagan Administration sought to arm rebels fighting against the Nicaraguan government with guns paid for by drug trafficking).




Artist impressions of the Lockerbie bombing. (Illustration by Anynobody)


The Interfor report was presented to Pam Am officials as well as members of the US Congress. One member of Congress, Jim Traficant of Ohio, took up the issue. Traficant demanded an investigation and entered the report into the Congressional Record. Not long after that, Traficant was accused of corruption and hounded from Congress. The Interfor report itself was attacked and Interfor's founder, Aviv, was subjected to a systematic smear campaign, especially when the issue was raised about possible CIA foreknowledge of an attack on Pam Am Flight 103. Meanwhile, governments and the corporate media continued to sell the "Libya-did-it" hoax.

Latest Report: CIA Held Syrians Responsible
The latest nail in the coffin of the "Libya-did-it" scenario surfaced just a few days ago. A sworn deposition signed by a former US spy who worked in the Middle East, Dr Richard Fuisz,
shows the CIA believed that Syrians—not Libyans—were responsible for the Lockerbie bombing. Dr. Fuisz says he was told directly by his CIA bosses that Syrians operating under orders of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC) carried out the attack on Pam Am Flight 103.


Libya's Dictator Colonel Muammar Gaddafi Upon His Capture and Just Before His Summary
Execution by Western-backed 'Rebels':
  All Gaddafi got for capitulating to a multi-billion dollar
payoff for a bombing that his country didn't commit and agreeing to all other demands of
the West was a Western-backed overthrow of his country, and a knife up his rear end.
(Screen capture from video)

What We Now Know
We now know what the United States, Scotland, other Western governments and some members of corporate media have known all along: 1) The Lockerbie bombing trial of Abdel Basset Al-Megrahi was a total sham; 2) The Scottish government knew the trial was a sham, Al-Megrahi was innocent, and that Libya was likely not responsible for the Lockerbie bombing (and the Scottish government said as much in its own report); 3) Pam Am Airlines had information that suggested Al-Megrahi was likely innocent, and that Libya was likely not involved based on an investigation Pam Am had commissioned itself, 4) The CIA (and therefore the United States) did not believe the Libyans were involved in the Lockerbie bombing and blamed Syrians and the PFLP-GC instead. However, the United States continued to tell the public otherwise, perhaps to cover-up involvement of some of its "assets" in drug trafficking which perhaps resulted in the bombing of Pam Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie.

Many Questions Still Remain
Why the charade all of these years? Why were sanctions unfairly forced on Libya by the UN at the behest of Western governments? Why did Libya agree to hand over Abdel Basset Al-Megrahi and why did it agree to pay reparations to victims' families (most likely, Libya wanted to rid itself of the UN sanctions and avoid a threatened "Iraq-like" attack)? Most important: Why were victims families (and the world) lied to by the United States, Scotland, the UN and corporate media? 

Maybe one day soon the corporate media—and members of the so-called "progressive media"—will stop yelling "conspiracy theorist" long enough to seek real answers to these questions.


_______________


For a thorough background on the real story of the bombing of Pam Am Flight 103,
this is a "must listen to" radio broadcast:
"Libya and Lockerbie: The Untold Story"
Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone


Ralph Schoenman (Left) and Mya Shone
(Video capture from video: Victoria Indy TV, left; Marin Humane Society, right)

Taking Aim Radio
(Originally broadcast on WBAI, NY Radio, Pacifica Network
September 2, 2003)



________________



Accused Lockerbie bomber Abdel Basset Al-Megrahi speaks from
his death-bed in Libya: 'truth will soon emerge'
(Notice the Tribune's title for the video still refers to Al-Megrahi as the 'Lockerbie bomber')



_______

Rick Ross Cleared for Use of Ex-Drug Kingpin's Name

The 'fake' Rick Ross, William Leonard Roberts, (left) and the real 'Freeway' Ricky Ross. The 'real' Rick Ross
was peripherally and unknowingly involved in the Iran-Contra Cocaine for Guns operation run by Colonel
Oliver North for the Reagan Administration. Ross' drug network helped the North gang initiate a national
crack cocaine epidemic, the purpose of which was to raise funds to arm right-wing mercenaries in Latin
America. (Left: Photo by A Continuous Lean; Right: Screen capture from video)

LOS ANGELES (CN) - The former cocaine kingpin who claims that rapper Rick Ross stole his name and identity cannot sue, a California appeals court ruled.

Ricky D. Ross gained some notoriety in the 1980s for running a massive drug-dealing operation, selling as much as $3 million worth of cocaine daily. Freeway, as he was known, served two stints in prison for his crimes, which is where he read a magazine article about then-up-and-coming rapper who shared his name.

In 2008 it was revealed that the chart-topping performer born William Leonard Roberts II had actually been a former correctional officer before adopting the name Rick Ross and rapping about the gangster lifestyle.

READ MORE...

Connections Between Freeway Ricky Ross, The Bush Administration,
and The Crack Cocaine Epidemic






New Mass Graves in Mexico Dredge Up Plight of Missing: At Least 54 Bodies Found - 'National Emergeny' Compared to Balkan Wars

New mass graves in Mexico dredge up plight of missing (via AFP)
Amid Mexico's continuous drug conflict, the recent discovery of dozens of bodies in mass graves has led some to describe the plight of the country's disappeared as a national emergency. At least 54 corpses have been recovered in clandestine pits in…

Mexican Cartels Are Worse Than ISIS: Big Media Hides This — To Demonize Muslims And Coverup What's Happening On America's Border

Nothing you've seen ISIS do in Iraq or Syria is worse than what Mexico's drug cartels (narco-terrorists) have been  doing everyday in Mexico. In fact, one could argue that the ISIS madmen were taught everything they know by Mexico's cartels. From 2006 to 2012 the drug war has taken 60,000 lives in Mexico — 16,000 in 2013 alone. ISIS has done nowhere near that level of carnage - Yet.

A Crucified Man: Yes, the cartels do that in Mexico. Long before ISIS was doing it in Iraq.
A Crucified Man: Yes, the cartels do that in Mexico. Long before ISIS was doing it in Iraq.


By
The horrific rampage of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) has captured the world’s attention. Many Western commentators have characterized ISIL’s crimes as unique, no longer practiced anywhere else in the civilized world. They argue that the group’s barbarism is intrinsically Islamic, a product of the aggressive and archaic worldview that dominates the Muslim world. The ignorance of these claims is stunning.
Western obsession with the Islamic State is fueled more by bigotry than any genuine assessment of risk or atrocities.

While there are other organized groups whose depravity and threat to the United States far surpasses that of ISIL, none has engendered the same kind of collective indignation and hysteria. This raises a question: Are Americans primarily concerned with ISIL’s atrocities or with the fact that Muslims are committing these crimes?

Mexico's cartels don't care about gender or age. Here a 15-year-old boy is forced to give a speech before he is beheaded via sword. (Screen capture from video)
Mexico's cartels don't care about gender or age. Here a 15-year-old boy is forced to
give a speech before he is beheaded via sword. (Screen capture from video)

For example, even as the U.S. media and policymakers radically inflate ISIL’s threat to the Middle East and United States, most Americans appear to be unaware of the scale of the atrocities committed by Mexican drug cartels and the threat they pose to the United States.

___________________


Corporate media tells everyone that ISIS is the best funded terrorist organization in the world.  Yet Mexico's narco-terrorists control a multi-billion dollar drug trade.

(Click to see full-sized image)
Top Row: Home made armored tank-truck, home made submarine used to move cocaine
from Colombia to Mexico, weapons haul from just one drug bust. Middle Row: RPG7
grenade launchers, 50 caliber sniper rifle, grenades. Bottom Row: Body armor from one
drug bust, underground tunnel to America with its own lighting, air supply and railway
system, cash haul from just one drug bust.
Mexico's narco-terrorists could likely overthrow the Mexican government.
They don't need to — They already own it.


___________________



Cartels versus ISIL

A recent United Nations report estimated nearly 9,000 civilians have been killed and 17,386 wounded in Iraq in 2014, more than half since ISIL fighters seized large parts on northern Iraq in June. It is likely that the group is responsible another several thousand deaths in Syria. To be sure, these numbers are staggering. But in 2013 drug cartels murdered more than 16,000 people in Mexico alone, and another 60,000 from 2006 to 2012 — a rate of more than one killing every half hour for the last seven years. What is worse, these are estimates from the Mexican government, which is known to deflate the actual death toll by about 50 percent.

Women and men are prepared for beheading before they are chopped up and thrown into vats of acid. Just like ISIS, the cartels force victims to give a speech before they are killed (Screen capture from video)
Women and men are prepared for beheading before they are chopped
up and thrown into vats of acid. Just like ISIS, the cartels force victims
to give a speech before they are killed (Screen capture from video)
Statistics alone do not convey the depravity and threat of the cartels. They carry out hundreds of beheadings every year. In addition to decapitations, the cartels are known to dismember and otherwise mutilate the corpses of their victims — displaying piles of bodies prominently in towns to terrorize the public into compliance. They routinely target women and children to further intimidate communities. Like ISIL, the cartels use social media to post graphic images of their atrocious crimes.

The narcos also recruit child soldiers, molding boys as young as 11 into assassins or sending them on suicide missions during armed confrontations with Mexico’s army. They kidnap tens of thousands of children every year to use as drug mules or prostitutes or to simply kill and harvest their organs for sale on the black market. Those who dare to call for reforms often end up dead. In September, with the apparent assistance of local police, cartels kidnapped and massacred 43 students at a teaching college near the Mexican town of Iguala in response to student protests. A search in the area for the students has uncovered a number of mass graves containing mutilated bodies burned almost beyond recognition, but none of the remains have been confirmed to be of the students.


Hanging people from bridges so they can be seen by rush-hour travelers is a favorite tactic of Mexico's cartels.
Hanging people from bridges so they can be seen by rush-hour travelers is a favorite
tactic of Mexico's cartels.

While the Islamic militants have killed a handful of journalists, the cartels murdered as many as 57 since 2006 for reporting on cartel crimes or exposing government complicity with the criminals. Many of Mexico’s media have been effectively silenced by intimidation or bribes. These censorship activities extend beyond professional media, with narcos tracking down and murdering ordinary citizens who criticize them on the Internet, leaving their naked and disemboweled corpses hanging in public squares. Yet American intellectuals such as Sam Harris appear to be more outraged when Muslims protest or issue threats in response to blasphemous or anti-Muslim hate speech than when cartels murder dozens of journalists and systematically co-opt an entire country’s media.

Cartel members force two men to confess to their "crimes" before a chainsaw is used to behead them. (Screen capture from video)
Cartel members force two men to confess to their "crimes"
before a chainsaw is used to behead them. (Screen capture
from video)
Similarly, Westerners across various political spectrums were outraged when ISIL seized 1,500 Yazidi women, committing sexual violence against the captives and using them as slaves. Here again, the cartels’ capture and trafficking of women dwarfs ISIL’s crimes. Narcos hold tens of thousands of Mexican citizens as slaves for their various enterprises and systematically use rape as a weapon of war.

Some of Mexico's drug cartels actually see themselves as crusading "Christians."  One group even calls itself the Knights Templar. But Bill Maher and Sam Harris find it convenient to ignore these groups while they are ranting about Muslims.

U.S. media have especially hyped ISIL’s violence against Americans. This summer ISIL beheaded two Americans and has warned about executing a third; additionally, one U.S. Marine has died in efforts to combat the group. By contrast, the cartels killed 293 Americans in Mexico from 2007 to 2010 and have repeatedly attacked U.S. consulates in Mexico. While ISIL’s beheadings are no doubt outrageous, the cartels tortured, dismembered and then cooked one of the Americans they captured — possibly eating him or feeding him to dogs.

America's corporate media has access to all of the videos I
captured images from and photographs I've added to this article.  Yet they haven't shown or told America's citizens a thing about these daily goings on in Mexico. Why?—Ronald David Jackson

The cartels’ atrocities are not restricted to the Mexican side of the border. From 2006 to 2010 as many as 5,700 Americans were killed in the U.S. by cartel-fueled drug violence. By contrast, 2,937 people were killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Over the last decade, some 2,349 Americans were killed in Afghanistan, and 4,487 Americans died in Iraq. In four years the cartels have managed to cause the deaths of more Americans than during 9/11 or either of those wars.

Does The Clothing Remind You of ISIS?: Blinded man is forced to give a speech before he is clubbed to death. (Screen capture from video)
Does The Clothing Remind You of ISIS?: Blindfolded man is forced to give a speech
before he is clubbed to death. (Screen capture from video)

Barack Obama’s administration claims ISIL poses a severe threat to U.S. interests and national security. However, the militants were primarily concerned with seizing and holding territory in Iraq and Syria until the U.S. began targeting them. Even now, while they have called for lone wolves to carry out attacks on targets in the United States, so far those arrested in connection to ISIL have been trying to go and fight abroad rather than plotting domestic attacks. To the extent ISIL wants to kill Americans, its primary tactic has been to try to lure U.S. troops to its turf by publicly executing citizens they already hold hostage. In fact, several U.S. intelligence officials have asserted that ISIL poses no credible threat to the United States homeland. However, the same cannot be said of the cartels.

Read More
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...