Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text
Survivor of US Drone Attack:
Obama Belongs on List of World's Tyrants

Poisoning Black Cities: Corporate Campaign to Ethnically Cleanse US Cities Massive Marches in Poland
Against Authoritarian Threat of Far-Right
Ethiopia’s Invisible Crisis: Land Rights Activists Kidnapped and Tortured

Global Perspectives Now Global Perspectives Now
Showing posts with label unions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unions. Show all posts

Republicans HATE Unions and Their Members: Yet Many White Union Members Keep Voting For Republicans

The "leader" of the Republicans in the Senate is willing to render retired miners homeless for political revenge. The Republicans are more concerned about their friends on Wall Street than they are about their staunchest supporters: whites in the working class.—Ronald David Jackson

Illustration by DonkeyHotey.
Illustration by DonkeyHotey.


A Huge Coal Miners’ Pension Plan is on the Brink of Failure. One Senator is Blocking a Fix.

Despite bipartisan support for a plan to save the workers' retirement and healthcare, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell stands in the way
By
When Sen. Mitch McConnell strode into the Capitol for last month’s State of the Union speech, he took with him a guest whose presence was sure to be seen as a slap against the Obama administration and its policies on coal.

“I brought along this unemployed coal miner here,” McConnell (R-Ky.) said, gesturing to fourth-generation mineworker Howard Abshire, “to see the person who put him out of work.”

The Senate majority leader said he wanted to call attention to President Obama’s “heartless” regulations that he argues have devastated communities in Abshire’s native eastern Kentucky. Yet just weeks earlier, McConnell’s office had delivered its own blow to Appalachian coal towns: It blocked efforts to rescue health and pension funds on which thousands of retired and disabled miners rely.

A plan that would ensure the solvency of the funds nearly made it through Congress in December as part of the bipartisan budget deal that cleared both chambers. But the bailout attempt — backed by key lawmakers from both political parties — was excluded from the deal at McConnell’s request, according to four Senate officials directly familiar with the events.

McConnell’s spokesman does not dispute that telling of events. And McConnell has not publicly explained his opposition to the measure.

Legislators from coal states had pressed for federal help to prevent what some have described as a looming national crisis: The United Mine Workers of America’s retirement and health-care funds currently support about 120,000 former miners and their families nationwide, but the account balances have rapidly declined as some coal companies shed dues-paying workers and others filed for bankruptcy protection. Without intervention, some of the funds — chiefly those associated with firms in bankruptcy — could run out of cash before spring, Congressional officials say.

McConnell has repeatedly clashed with the UMWA, the union that administers the funds. Two years ago, UMWA officials donated heavily to his political rival, Democrat Alison Grimes, during McConnell’s successful reelection bid.

During December’s bipartisan budget agreement, his stance was clear.

“It was a no-go issue for McConnell,” said a senior Senate aide with direct knowledge. Three other Democratic congressional officials confirmed his opposition to the measure. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity citing the sensitive nature of the budget negotiations.

Read More

Hog Brains and a Mysterious Illness Linked to Bacon Processing by LadyDrawers

In Ladydrawers' latest strip in the "Growing Season" comics exploration of public health, race and food policy, Laura Ķeniņš and Anne Elizabeth Moore explore how the production of certain popular meat products is linked to corporate malfeasance, public health risks and profound, citywide racism - not to mention all the weird additives. For workers and eaters alike, the world of meat processing is packed with dangers.







__________________


Laura Ķeniņš
Laura Ķeniņš has been self-publishing comics and zines since 2003 and others have been publishing her work for nearly as long. She graduated from the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design in Halifax, Nova Scotia, specializing in printmaking and photography. Her work has been exhibited in locations across Europe and Canada.


Anne Elizabeth Moore
Anne Elizabeth Moore is a cultural critic and author of several award-winning, best-selling nonfiction books including Unmarketable (The New Press) and Cambodian Grrrl (Cantankerous Titles). She has held Fulbright scholarships and was a USC Annenberg/Getty Arts Journalism Fellow. Her work has appeared in The Baffler, Al Jazeera, Salon, The Onion, Talking Points Memo, Wilson Quarterly, Tin House, and in international art exhibitions including the Whitney Biennial and solo shows at the MCA Chicago. She has appeared on CNN, NPR, and in The New York Times, among others, and currently lives in Chicago.


Originally Published on TruthOut

Police Union President Previously Accused of Criminal Behavior Arrested For Beating Daughter, Blames It On Daugher

Stephanie Lopez



By Max Chantha
Recent years have seen a rise in publicity for police unions and their leaders, most famous for their unquestioning defense of criminal officers and leadership that spouts vitriolic rhetoric.

Stephanie Lopez, president of the Albuquerque Police Officers Association (APOA), proved this stereotype to be true, and herself as both a bully and a criminal, after being arrested for beating her underage daughter.


Lopez was charged with child abuse and booked on a $5,000 bond after causing great bodily harm to her daughter.

The daughter was struck repeatedly in the head, had her hair pulled, and was thrown to the ground by Lopez.

After reporting it to her school resource officers, the daughter and school administrators went to law enforcement – a somewhat brave act, considering her mother’s relationship with the police department.

As such, the Bernalillo County Sherriff’s Department, instead of the Albuquerque Police Department, undertook the investigation and subsequent arrest.

Lopez mirrored the tone of police unions, infamous for rejecting the responsibility of officers in countless misuse of force cases, when she said that it was in fact her daughter’s fault that she had been beaten.

Lopez stated that her daughter failed to inform her of a utility bill, and thus brought the beating on herself.

While this abhorrent behavior should result in her termination as president of the APOA, it remains unlikely.

Lopez, unsurprisingly, has faced accusations of various criminal behavior, including bribery and witness intimidation, and retaliation against those who seek to bring her officers to justice.

Read More

The Cop Who Executed a Citizen on Camera is Now Suing the Police Union for Not Defending Him

Killer Cop Michael Slager standing over his victim and later as a prisoner.
Killer Cop Michael Slager standing over his victim and later as a prisoner.


By Dan McCue
The former North Charleston, S.C. police officer charged with murdering an unarmed black motorist in April sued a police fraternal group on Tuesday, claiming it unlawfully dropped the ball on his defense.

Michael Slager is charged with murdering Walter Scott on April 4 after the motorist ran from a traffic stop. He initially claimed he killed Scott in self defense after a struggle during which the fleeing man grabbed his Taser. However, a bystander's cellphone video contradicted that account, showing Slager shooting Scott five times in the back as he continued to run from the officer.

Scott's family later said they believe he fled because of an outstanding warrant for failure to timely pay child support.

In a lawsuit filed Nov. 10 in the Charleston Federal Court, Slager claims the Southern States Police Benevolent Association, which promises legal assistance to members, failed to get him a second attorney after his first one quit the case, and continues to fail to pay his legal bills, leaving him responsible for them.

Slager claims he first purchased a Legal Defense Benefit plan from the Southern States PBA in October 2011, that he discontinued it for a time, and then reinstated it on Jan. 31, 2015. He says at all times the policy was in effect, up to and including April 2015, he paid a monthly fee of $23,50 for coverage.

Slager says immediately after his arrest he made a request for benefits under the Legal Defense Benefit plan, and the Southern States PBA granted that request, assigning attorney David Aylor to his case.

Three days later, Aylor abruptly resigned.

"Following Attorney Aylor's sudden departure from representation, Officer Slager requested that Southern States PBA reassign another attorney to represent him under the Legal Defense Benefit plan," the complaint says.

"On Aril 8, 2015, just four days after the Scott incident and just four days after having provided benefits under the Legal Defense Benefit plan, Defendant Southern States PBA denied Officer Slager's request for representation."

Slager claims that at no time did Southern States PBA undertake an investigation after which it would have concluded he was not entitled to coverage under the plan, nor did it request to interview him before terminating his benefits.

"Whether Officer Slager acted criminally is the subject matter of the pending criminal charges against him," the complaint says. "Rather than continue to provide coverage benefits as it did between April 4 and April 7, 2015, on April 8, 2015 Defendant Southern States PBA acted in bad faith in summarily terminating benefits to its insured."

Read More

Charter School Chain Accused of Union Busting — Lawsuit

In some states, the main purpose of charter schools is to avoid unions and the rights, wages and power they provide for teachers. 

Photo by Ted Eytan.
Photo by Ted Eytan.

By REBEKAH KEARN
A chain of public charter schools is using its charter status to harass and threaten teachers for trying to unionize, California's Public Employment Relations Board claims in court.

The PERB sued Alliance College-Ready Public Charter Schools and its 27 Los Angeles area campuses in Superior Court on Friday.

United Teachers Los Angeles, which represents thousands of public schoolteachers in collective bargaining, is named as real party in interest.

An Alliance spokeswoman called it a "dishonest, malicious and desperate" attempt by the teachers union to "intimidate" Alliance leaders.

It's the latest of dozens of lawsuits over the years to accuse charter schools of using their status as a smokescreen to spend tax dollars without following state and federal laws on public schools.

"The core of the injunctive complaint is the allegation that the charter schools are engaging in a campaign of anti-union activity," the PERB's General Counsel J. Felix De La Torre told Courthouse News.

The status quo injunction is intended to "end this pattern of conduct" so the PERB can investigate four charges already before it and determine if state law has been violated, De La Torres said.

About 70 teachers emailed Alliance's board of directors in March, announcing their intent to unionize with United Teachers and asking Alliance to meet and discuss "a fair and neutral process to organize," the complaint states, citing one of the open letters.

In response, Alliance sent a 4-page letter "that was critical of UTLA, collective bargaining, and unionization and urged employees not to sign authorization cards," the complaint states.

Shortly afterward, the board says, principal Lori Rhodes kicked a union representative off an Alliance campus for discussing unionization with teacher Michelle Buckowski. Rhodes then harassed Buckowski, telling her that supporting the union "was an uneducated position," and that Buckowski should "focus on her upcoming formal performance evaluation."

Read More

Why Did the American Federation of Teachers End Its Coca-Cola Boycott? — Because Someone Got Paid

In the early days, Coca Cola made you real "happy" - because it  contained cocaine among other "happy" ingredients.
In the early days, Coca Cola made you real "happy" - because it
contained cocaine among other "happy" ingredients.
By RUSSELL MOKHIBER
In October, 2014, the American Federation of Teachers passed a resolution to boycott all Coca-Cola products.

The resolution — “Stop Coca-Cola’s Abuse of Children and Violation of Human Rights” — called for a boycott of Coca-Cola products based upon a litany of violations of workers’ rights and child labor laws on the part of the company.

Now, just four months after that resolution was passed, the AFT executive committee, has reversed course and passed a resolution ending the boycott.

AFT officials said that the passage of the boycott resolution last year “drew an immediate reaction from the Coca-Cola Company, whose national leadership sought an opportunity to provide the American Federation of Teachers with information on actions taken in recent years to address these concerns.”

As a result of these meetings, the AFT “will collaborate with the Coca-Cola Company in areas where we have a strong mutual interest, such as the elimination of hazardous child labor and advocating for increased educational opportunities for children as the best way to eliminate the poverty that is the root cause of child labor.”

The partnership agreement between AFT and Coca-Cola was signed March 23 by AFT President Randi Weingarten and Ed Potter, Coke’s director of global workplace rights.

Also on hand was former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alexis Herman, who is a member of the Coca-Cola board of directors.

The grassroots movement to push the Coca-Cola boycott resolution was spearheaded by Barbara Bowen, a professor of English at Queens College and the Graduate Center of The City University of New York (CUNY) and current president of the Professional Staff Congress/CUNY. Bowen did not return calls seeking comment.

But the reversal of the boycott did not sit well with the AFT members at the grassroots who were involved in getting the boycott resolution passed. And it did not sit well with other consumer and labor activists.

Sharon Silvio, an AFT union member from Rochester, New York, said she was “very disappointed” in the reversal of the boycott and wanted questions answered about how and why the reversal came about.

NYU Professor Marion Nestle, author of the upcoming Soda Politics: Taking on Big Soda (and Winning) (Oxford University Press, October 2015), said Coca-Cola’s partnership with AFT “is an example of Coke’s typical strategy: partner and buy the silence of the partners on issues of labor rights and health.”

Read More

The ANC’s Stranglehold On Justice: South Africa's 'Liberators' No Longer the Party It Used to Be





By Douglas Schorr
The African National Congress is not the party it used to be. Jacob Zuma, now into his second term as President of South Africa, is spearheading a new movement in South African politics. The President and his party are conducting a war on the judiciary and in the process making corruption unprosecuteable - a new word for a new political practice.

In 1995- General George Fivaz was appointed by President Nelson Mandela as the first National Commissioner of the new South African Police Service (SAPS). Mandela required that the General’s first task was to transform the many Apartheid forces into one and to tackle crime. Fivaz lasted his term but only just. By coincidence my neighbor at the time, I recall him saying something about the interference becoming too much to tolerate. In 2000 out of the bag came a Mr Jackie Selebi[1] to replace him.

A former head of the ANC youth league and holder of the Human Rights Award from the International Service for Human Rights, Selebi took corruption by the horns. A report by Rademeyer and Wilkinson states that it was on Selebi’s orders that the police’s Anti-Corruption Unit (ACU) was shut down, seven years after it was instituted. In that period (1996 – 2001) the unit received 20,779 allegations of police corruption. Between 1995 and 1999 an average of 1,320 polic men and women were convicted each year on criminal charges. As of June 2014, and with no terminations in sight, 1,448 serving police officers were convicted criminals, among them a major-general, ten brigadiers, 21 colonels, ten majors, 43 lieutenant-colonels, 163 captains, 84 lieutenants and 716 warrant officers.[2]

Given that the police force numbers nearly 160,000 officers that isn’t a big number at all, except for the type of crimes those 1,448 committed. They range from murder and attempted murder to rape, assault, corruption, theft, robbery, house-breaking, drug trafficking, domestic violence and aiding escapees. The report concludes, ‘The record suggests police crime higher than police admit.’

Selebi wasn’t to last. In 2008 he was charged with corruption, put on extended leave and in 2009 replaced by former Member of the Executive Council for Transport, Safety and Security in KwaZulu-Natal, Bheki Cele - a man who had already proven a liking for treating government money as an entertainment and advertising fund for the ANC in support of Zuma in rural KwaZulu-Natal.[3]

Cele has an odd background in the party. He always appeared high on the party lists yet never made it into either Mbeki or Zuma’s cabinet, except here. Compared to a cabinet post, National Commissioner of Police is administrative and normally, at least in the British system, a career appointment. Cele assisted Zuma until his own double-dealing came to light. It seems he authorized gross over-payments to the tune of R1.7 billion on two building leases, at least allegedly. Zuma declared Cele ‘unfit for office’ and in the same breath installed him in the easier to skive and dive job of Deputy Minister for Agriculture. In July 2012 Cele launched a court application to contest the findings (alleging) ‘the president’s decision was actuated by ulterior motivates’[4] but it seems to have fizzled out and the two have called a truce. Cele is still going strong. In 2013 he was placed on the ANC's list of preferred candidates to go to parliament. In 2014 he attempted to delay the South African Public Protector's report on wasteful expenditure at Nkandla, President Zuma’s private homestead.

Out with Cele then, in with Ms Riah Phiyega (full name Mangwashi Victoria Phiyega), a more sophisticated proposition. With a BA in Social Work, an MA in Social Sciences and a post-graduate diploma in Business Administration Phiyega was a fire-cracker who had held some high-powered posts including Group Executive for corporate affairs of ABSA and separately of Transnet, jobs reserved for the crème de la crème.

It didn’t take Phiyega long to get sucked into controversy. At the Marikana commission of inquiry, where the deaths of 34 protesting miners at the hands of police were being investigated, she did a sterling job of being evasive - fueling speculation that she was protecting Police Minister Mthethwa.[5] She has also been fingered in the tipping off of Western Cape police commissioner Arno Lamoer, regarding a probe against him carried out by crime intelligence.[6]

‘In the 18 months or so since her appointment, Phiyega and the SAPS have stumbled from one crisis to the next’, reported the Mail and Guardian in a sad account of her performance so far.[7] It’s important to note too that the saga surrounding Transnet for pension plundering during Phiyega’s tenure is ongoing.[8] ABSA is but a part of the world’s biggest bank, Barclays, an institution not adverse to criminal activity either. ‘Ed Miliband demands criminal probe into Barclays interest rate rigging scandal as £3.2bn is wiped off bank in share plunge’, roared a recent Daily Mail news story.[9] The fine the bank got amounted to a tee-hee-hee slap on the wrist; relatively speaking black folk in South Africa have been hit far harder for nicking bread to eat. Of course both instances are damning by association only, but certainly a murky background worth noting if only for the standard business practice and the fluid line between business and politics.

While the police are at the front line of crime prevention, behind them are other bodies set up to further combat specialised crime. An excellent idea in theory, but one that has been violated in practice.

In January 2001 the Scorpions, brainchild of the Fivaz/Mbeki era, were formed. They were different from the everyday prosecution service. Through the National Prosecution Authority (NPA) they reported direct to the Minister of Judiciary and Correctional Services, meaning that they were independent, as independent as the judges and magistrates were. Their charge was to gun for crimes of national priority. President Mbeki showed he was serious by making sure they were kitted out with the best brains and equipment.

Soon, with a prosecution success rate of over 90%, the Scorpions were proving the principle of equality before the law in South Africa. However the national priority targets were all too often ANC and business aligned. Included among many dropped cases were the arms deal connections and high profile types like Mac Maharaj, Jacob Zuma and Shabir Shaik.

In 2008 Mbeki was to go and Kgalema Motlanthe, the stand-in while Zuma was being cleared (taking a step from the dock and a pesky rape trial to Government House), decided Mbeki’s Scorpions would be better placed to serve if it were a subordinate member of the police force, despite Mbeki’s original mandate having been “to deal with all national priority crime, including police corruption".[10] In 2009 the Scorpions were disbanded, ANC Chief Whip Mthethwa was a principal agent in their demise.[11] Yes, he is the Minister of Police referred to above.

The Hawks replaced the Scorpions. Its CEO Mr Anwa Dramat was also the police Deputy Commissioner, creating a cozy arrangement with the SAPS which manifested itself in the close-down of all Scorpion investigations and on-going prosecutions. The new Hawks were out to tackle ‘serious crime referred to it by the National Commissioner of the South African Police Service’,[12] making the already proven corrupt now in charge of investigations on their own.

In 1996, Act No. 108 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa created a single National Prosecution Authority (NPA), a body with the power to institute criminal proceedings on behalf of the State, accountable to the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services. The first man chosen to head up the NPA was multimillionaire Bulelani T Ngcuka, described by opposition Democratic Alliance spokeswoman Sheila Camerer as being "… a tough-minded crime-buster who played rough and acted without fear, favour or prejudice when pursuing criminals as required by the constitution and therefore he was the right man for the job.”[13] But after 10 years and having investigated Jacob Zuma to the point of declaring “there was prima facie evidence to suspect Mr. Zuma of corruption in a multi-million dollar arms deal, but not enough to prosecute him”[14] , he suddenly resigned. It was a film script written for Zuma; he was able to immediately proclaim Ngcuka’s action robbed him of the opportunity of proving his innocence. Further factions of the ANC accused Ngcuka of being an Apartheid spy and a stooge.

Ngcuka’s actions after leaving the NPA have openened a new perspective on the man, however. He became Chairman and co-incidentally had a substantial holding in Basil Read, one of the 15 major construction companies fined R1.46 billion ‘for “rampant” collusive tendering’, cheating all South Africans, between 2006 and 2011. To give perspective, that fine is roughly equivalent to being fined R2 for stealing R10, not even a slap on the wrist.

In 2005 Ngcuka was succeeded by advocate Vusumzi "Vusi" Pikoli, a man who earned his degree from the University of Zimbabwe and completed military training in Angola as part of the ANC’s armed resistance. Pikoli the firebrand instituted criminal charges against Selebi as well as Zuma. He was first suspended and then fired. However the Ginwala Commission recommended he be restored to his post once “sensitized to the broader responsibilities of his office and in particular to enhance his understanding of the security environment in which that office should function.”[15] While the tussle was on public prosecutor and longtime advocate Mokotedi Mpshe stood in as Director of the NPA. In April 2009, Mpshe ‘decided to drop more than 700 corruption and other charges against Jacob Zuma.’[16]

Pikoli wasn’t re-appointed. Zuma had found someone else. In 2009 former justice director general Menzi Simelane was given the job by the president. But the High Court found differently, declaring Simelane unfit to hold office. Importantly, the court found Zuma’s subjective appointment was ‘not in keeping with the constitutional guarantee of prosecutorial independence’. Significant here is that the ANC knew before the appointment that Simelane was tainted. The Ginwala inquiry had already severely criticised his abilities while justice director general, his conduct found to be “irregular” and his action of drafting a letter to Pikoli instructing him to abort the imminent arrest of former police boss Jackie Selebi held to be a potential contravention of the NPA Act.[1]7 Simelane’s removal has so far stood, but he’s not bothered as he’s been moved to another lucrative spot; legal advisor to the Minister of Public Service and Administration – it is good work when it’s offered.

As Stephen Grootes pointed out, once Zuma had control over the NPA he had no need to challenge the judges – they can only hear what is brought to be heard and to that extent it would have been a smart move to get Simelane’s appointment through.[18]

While the legalities were being attended to Nomgcobo Jiba, wife of former Scorpions member Booker Nhantsi (who was convicted of the theft of R193,000 in trust funds), held the top post. Her man is crucial to the tale since Jiba’s claim to fame - the attempted arrest of ex-Scorpion Gauteng Head Gerrie Nel just as he was to prosecute Selebi in January 2008 - is still seen as an act of revenge against Nel who was instrumental in prosecuting her husband. Nel won that tussle; Selebi got a 15-year prison sentence[19] and the City Press story “Jiba wanted Nel ‘by hook or by crook’” of 4 August 2012[20] indicates the attempt was all part of the political hit to get rid of the Scorpions.

Incidentally, President Zuma had Nhantsi’s record expunged. Incidentally also, Richard Mdluli, then crime intelligence boss, signed an affidavit putting his support behind Jiba in the matter, instrumental in allowing her to keep her job. Ms Jiba has since claimed she was ‘innocently involved in the Nel matter and not the main driver of it.’ Perhaps so, but it doesn’t detract from the assault on South Africa’s legal integrity. Nor does it answer why Jiba went after Natal Hawks head Major General Johan Booysen, on, as Judge Trevor Gorven described it, charges that ‘did not meet even the barest of minimum requirements.’[21]

In May 2013 the well-followed Breytenbach case finally came to a head, perhaps the most damning indictment of the NPA’s rotten core. NPA prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach was diligently at work on several high profile prosecution cases, including one against Richard Mdluli - the details of which hinged around a letter Mdluli wrote to Zuma where he offered to use his position as crime intelligence head to assist Zuma in achieving a second presidential term. Another case on Breytenbach’s docket was the mineral rights quarrel between the Sishen Iron Ore Company and Imperial Crown Trading (ICT). ICT is partly owned by the Guptas and Duduzane Zuma – one of the President’s sons.[22]

The trauma Breytenbach was put through was serious but more so the long-term outlook for equality before the law. Constitutional Law expert Pierre de Vos wrote: ‘The acquittal of prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach on all 15 charges brought against her by her superiors at the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) raises serious questions about the independence and impartiality of the NPA and its leadership. It will strengthen the increasingly widely held perception that senior NPA leaders are appointed because of their political loyalty to the dominant faction inside the ANC and not because of their personal integrity, independent attitude and ability to act without fear, favour or prejudice (as required by the Constitution).’[23]

Next up to bat for the NPA was Mxolisi Sandile Oliver Nxasana, effective 1 October 2013. It appears all was fine, Nxasana was getting on with the job and then suddenly ‘a character who was fit for high office is shown to be flawed. Comrades of decades feign surprise, condonation becomes condemnation.’[24] Nxasana had been through a thorough selection phase only to have the ANC and President’s office turn on him. The debate is ongoing. The opposition Democratic Alliance says: ‘We believe that Nxasana’s attempts to reinstate charges of murder, kidnapping and defeating the ends of justice against disgraced crime intelligence head, Richard Mdluli, have put his job on the line.’[25]

Why it is good to be a part of the ANC? This was explained at a gala dinner held in Durban on Friday 11 January 2013, one that raised R21 million for the party. “Support is fine, we love it. But if you just go beyond that and become a member, you’ll realise everything of yours will go very well. If you are a businessman business will thrive. Everything you touch will multiply” said Zuma, quoted in the City Press. All of the self-made billionaires and millionaires present confirmed.[26]

How far is corruption going to go? The spider’s web between the ANC’s main political players and big business’ stand-out personalities only grows thicker. Eskom and water affairs were long ago lined up for privitisation – allow it to fail a little longer and its processing will be ready for Zuma and Co’s picking. Mr Ramaphosa is the likely man for the job. It seems South Africans need not worry about switching off the lights; they’ll only come on when paid for.

I end with a summary from P Smith of Africa Confidential. I can’t phrase it better. He calls it ‘No-Fly Zone For Legal Eagles’, written in 2015: ‘The presidency is working to remove police and prosecutors who refuse to suspend actions against highly influential people. The decline in independence of South Africa's top criminal justice institutions is accelerating as President Jacob Zuma redoubles his efforts to immunise himself and his entourage from prosecution over corruption. That is the verdict of a growing number of legal experts as more and more senior police officers and prosecutors are removed. Corrupt business links with the governing African National Congress and the Presidency are mounting, so the pressures on prosecutors and investigators to be soft on them multiply. State officials are increasingly facing administrative suspension if they do not comply.’

____________
* A former soldier and District Commissioner in then Rhodesia, Douglas Schorr is today a committed critic of capitalism and colonial legacies, citing them as the source of poverty in Africa. His first book, The Myth of Smith, an autobiographical account of his awakening to the reality of the Rhodesian Bush War while involved in it, is available for sale on [url=bit.ly/TheMythOfSmith]Amazon Kindle[/url]. He is currently at work on his second book ‘God Chose Mugabe?’, dealing with the global economic and political forces that played a part in Robert Mugabe’s election, and how those forces continue to shape the destiny of Zimbabwe and other countries in the region. Schorr blogs at http://dougschorr.blogspot.com and can be found on [url=https://www.facebook.com/DouglasSchorrAuthor
]Facebook[/url]

END NOTES

[1] http://www.saps.gov.za/about/history.php
[2] http://africacheck.org/reports/south-africas-criminal-cops-is-the-rot-far-worse-than-we-have-been-told ...
[3] ‘Institutionalizing Elites: Political Elite Formation and Change’ by Suzanne Francis https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/18561/ASC-075287668-3104-01.pdf?sequence=2 ‘Even back in those days, 2009, the government was doing extensive project and promotion work for the people of the Nkandla area specifically – Zuma’s birthplace’ (p163).
[4] http://mg.co.za/article/2014-11-09-jacob-zuma-defends-his-decision-to-fire-bheki-cele
[5] http://mg.co.za/article/2013-03-20-phiyega-survives-day-one-of-marikana-cross-examination
[6] http://mg.co.za/article/2013-10-30-ipid-plans-probe-into-allegations-against-phiyega
[7] http://mg.co.za/article/2013-10-30-phiyegas-distress-was-inevitable
[8] http://www.timeslive.co.za
[9] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165468/Ed-Miliband-demands-CRIMINAL-probe-Barclays-scandal-3-2bn-wiped-bank-share-plunge.html
[10] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorpions_(South_Africa)
[11] http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2012-11-14-analysis-the-multiple-ironies-of-nathi-mthethwa
[12] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawks_(South_Africa)
[13] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3925955.stm
[14] ‘South Africa's crime-buster quits’ … http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3925955.stm
[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Prosecuting_Authority
[16] http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/news/top-prosecutor-post-mired-in-controversy-1.1700949#.VPbwgjoWFFI
[17] http://mg.co.za/article/2009-11-25-menzi-simelane-to-head-up-npa
[18] http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2014-06-09-npa-leadership-fiasco-president-jacob-zumas-not-so-hidden-hand/
[19] http://whoswho.co.za/gerrie-nel-586516
[20] http://www.citypress.co.za/politics/jiba-wanted-nel-by-hook-or-by-crook-20120804/
[21] http://mg.co.za/article/2014-03-31-charges-dropped-against-suspended-hawks-head
[22] http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2013-05-28-breytenbach-too-little-fear-favour-and-prejudice/#.VPgOmzoWFFI
[23] http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2013-05-28-breytenbach-too-little-fear-favour-and-prejudice/#.VPgOmzoWFFI
[24] ‘Control over comrades’ @ http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/opinion/
[25] http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Nxasana-inquiry-a-witch-hunt-DA-20150201
[26] http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2013-01-21-south-africas-power-elite



Reprinted with permission from Pambazuka News.
 

United Steelworkers Union Buried Evidence of Firestone Support of Liberia's Warlord After Labor Deal — Warlord Was Convicted of War Crimes


By Jonathan Jones, special to ProPublica, and T. Christian Miller, ProPublica
In 1996, Firestone, one of the world's largest tire-makers, was locked in a grueling labor dispute with the United Steelworkers of America. The union portrayed it as a struggle between blue-collar workers and a company that was aiming to slash the pay and benefits of its employees. Thousands of workers went on strike, and the union mounted a consumer boycott of Firestone products and those of its Japanese-owned corporate parent, Bridgestone. There were protest demonstrations, too, including a "black flag" motorcycle brigade at the nation's most famous auto race, the Indianapolis 500.

The steelworkers – who had begun representing Firestone employees after a merger with another union, the United Rubber Workers, in 1995 – also began looking into the company's activities abroad, most notably its rubber operations in Liberia. With the help of private investigators, the union uncovered evidence that in the early 1990's Firestone had been the source of money and logistical support for Charles Taylor, the notorious Liberian warlord whose violent bid for power had ensnared the country in a horrific civil war. The union then developed plans to use what it believed might have been criminal conduct by Firestone as leverage in the contract negotiations.

Plans were hatched to hold press conferences. A secret briefing was prepared for Vice President Al Gore. Importantly, there were also discussions about using the evidence of dealings with Taylor to demand that Firestone permit the steelworkers to play an active role in monitoring labor standards in Liberia. The union's documents from the time suggest it saw a greater good in revealing Firestone's history with Taylor — that doing so might make the company "accountable to the Liberian people and to the world," as the union stated in the introduction of the 43-page confidential report detailing their findings.

But the steelworkers union never made its findings public. Instead, it buried the investigation of Firestone's role in the Liberian civil war, and the company's actions remained secret for more than 20 years. What happened to the investigation is not clear. But just two weeks after the union completed its inquiry, Firestone and the steelworkers met in confidential negotiations, and soon reached a deal. The union won concessions on pay and benefits. But any formal notion of improving working conditions in Liberia was abandoned, and Firestone's dealing with Taylor would not be aired until a ProPublica and PBS Frontline investigation late last year.

The steelworkers would not comment at all — on their investigation into Firestone's activities in Liberia, what role the investigation had played in the negotiations, or why the union had decided to keep the information secret. In an email, Wayne Ranick, a spokesman for the steelworkers, said the union could not comment on the matter because key leaders from that time period, including the union president and general counsel, are now dead. Other figures involved in the investigation had retired, he said.

A Firestone official said the company could not shed any light on the episode. Paul M. Oakley, a spokesman, said the company is now focusing on returning its rubber operations in Liberia to a relative level of normalcy in the aftermath of the Ebola outbreak. Company officials, he said in an email, "are not inclined to spend a lot of time and effort combing through archives that may or may not have relevant information."

Joe Uehlein, a longtime labor activist who served on the steelworkers' global campaign strategy team, said Bridgestone Firestone was well aware of the union's investigation and that it had helped prompt the eventual deal.

The Liberia investigation "played a big role in bringing Bridgestone Firestone back to the negotiating table," said Uehlein, who is now retired.

Last November, ProPublica and PBS Frontline detailed for the first time the role Firestone played in the early stages of Taylor's bloody rise to power, a set of findings that in several key respects echoed the evidence the union's investigators had uncovered decades earlier.

The ProPublica and PBS Frontline story drew on hundreds of interviews, copies of documents found in court records, once-secret diplomatic cables, trial transcripts and work done by Liberia's Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Firestone, whose Liberian rubber plantation was regarded as the largest in the world, signed a formal deal with Taylor in 1992, agreeing to pay the warlord millions in exchange for being able to operate in the country during the early, brutally violent years of its civil war.

Taylor, who later was convicted of war crimes for atrocities carried out in Sierra Leone, testified under oath during his trial at The Hague that Firestone's money and cooperation had been critical to his insurrection.

Firestone maintains that it dealt with Taylor only under threat of violence and in order to preserve its investment and provide for thousands of its Liberian workers. It insists the company broke no laws, and that Liberia to this day benefits from its presence in Liberia.

Liberia has long been exploited for its rich natural resources and its occasional geopolitical usefulness – by its own leaders, as well as by foreign powers and global businesses. The country's historians have argued that the interests of the Liberian people have routinely lost out to the political or business deal of the moment.

To Edwin B. Cisco, news of the union's 1996 decision to make peace with Firestone and stay quiet about the company's dealings in Liberia carries a familiar sting. Cisco, the vice president of the union that represents employees on the company's rubber plantation outside the capital city of Monrovia, said he wished the steelworkers had made their findings about Firestone and Taylor public in order to hold the company accountable for its actions.

Cisco, though, was reluctant to criticize the American union too harshly, noting that he and his workers have received extensive training and support from the steelworkers over the last decade. And, as a union boss himself, he recognized the obligations the steelworkers had to their American members during the 1996 standoff.

"To be frank, they've recently done immensely well in providing moral and financial support toward the Liberian workforce, not just for Firestone workers, but other workers as well," Cisco said. 'They need to be commended for that."

ProPublica was given access to the union's boxes of Liberian material by a person who thought the union erred in not releasing the information at the time to help Liberian workers, and believes that Firestone still needs to improve its treatment of workers.

The boxes contained a formal investigative report, videos of scenes from the Firestone plantation, and internal union memos and correspondence. ProPublica disclosed the nature of the material to the steelworkers and Firestone in seeking explanations for the events of 1996.

The labor showdown between Firestone and its workers traced its roots to 1994, when Bridgestone, through its American subsidiary, Firestone, along with several other foreign tire companies, began demanding substantial wage and benefit concessions from American rubber workers.

In the summer of 1994, thousands of American rubber workers walked off the job at Firestone factories in five states. Numerous bargaining sessions were held, but the environment only worsened. Permanent replacement workers were hired by Firestone. Unfair labor practice complaints were filed by both sides.

The protracted strike depleted the treasury of the United Rubber Workers, which represented the Firestone workers, and in 1995 the union was forced to merge with the United Steelworkers of America. Once the steelworkers came on board, leaders assembled a strategy team to identify potential vulnerabilities for Bridgestone Firestone. Then union president George Becker later described his game plan to academic researchers.

"The last thing I wanted the company to think about before [they] went to bed at night, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, is all the problems and difficulties we caused them that day," said Becker. "And the first thing I wanted them to think of when they woke up is, oh Christ, I've got to go out and face them sons of bitches again."

Through the spring and summer of 1996, investigators with the steelworkers and the James Mintz Group, a private investigation firm, began gathering evidence of Firestone's relationship with Taylor. Investigators conducted interviews with former U.S. diplomats, academics, journalists and Liberian government officials, obtaining thousands of pages of documents.

Taylor, a onetime member of the government of Liberian President Samuel K. Doe, had launched a bid to topple Doe's regime in 1990. He assembled a rag tag army, one populated by child soldiers who became infamous for their atrocities and efforts at the ethnic cleansing of certain tribes in Liberia.

Taylor gained control of much of the country, and declared himself the de facto president. But he was not formally recognized by the United States, and the American State Department, among other agencies, chronicled his human rights abuses.

The documents the union turned up showed Firestone officials had initially embraced the idea that Taylor and his men were "freedom fighters," not terrorist rebels. The union's investigators asserted they had found evidence that Firestone had used humanitarian aid as a means to gain commercial advantages in Liberia from Taylor's rebels. And the investigators also obtained a "memorandum of understanding" between Firestone and Taylor's guerilla organization in which the company agreed to use Taylor's fighters to safeguard the company's assets on the plantation. The investigators, in their reports to the union, noted that the company had never spoken publicly about the agreement with Taylor.

The union also claimed to have obtained credible proof that a Firestone comptroller had wired $230,000 to a Taylor rebel bank account in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 22, 1992, shortly after Taylor's forces launched Operation Octopus, a surprise attack on Monrovia that plunged the country into years of additional conflict.

The records show that investigators also purchased video footage that they intended to circulate as part of their evidence of Firestone's dealings with Taylor. One clip appears to show a relaxed Taylor and his rebels on the Firestone rubber plantation in the early days of the 1992 assault on Monrovia.

Another clip shows a member of a West African peacekeeping force showing journalists evidence of a mass grave of alleged victims of Taylor's army, a grave located on the Firestone plantation.

By September 1996, the steelworkers had pulled together their material, concluding in their report that, Bridgestone Firestone's, "role in the Liberian civil war is a stunning example of a transnational arrogance in the pursuit of profit, heedless of the human cost of its actions."

"[Bridgestone Firestone], in its rush to resume operations of its plantation, ignored the consequences of its collaboration with Taylor, which led to slaughter of its workers, their families and other civilians on the plantation," Jerry Fernandez, the union's head of corporate campaigns and the director of the 10-month investigation of Firestone, wrote in an Oct. 14, 1996 memo.

The documents reviewed by ProPublica make clear the union was confident that the material would influence negotiations.

"We are one of the few institutions, outside of the mass media, that has the resources, contacts and ability to target this information worldwide," Fernandez wrote in one memo. "Certainly [Bridgestone Firestone] knows the impact that this would have on sales and corporate relationships."

"[Bridgestone Firestone] must be convinced that we have the resources and the will to carry out the above," Fernandez wrote in another internal memo. "They must understand our resolve on this will be played out in terms of impacting their markets, reputation and sales as well as disrupting their normal business relationships."

Fernandez suggested the steelworkers prepare a "hard-hitting, professionally done, pamphlet" for public distribution, laying out the evidence of Bridgestone Firestone's complicity in prolonging the Liberian civil war and urging American consumers and retailers to stop using rubber products that, "are made a by company that, literally, has blood on its hands," Fernandez wrote.

Upon publication of the pamphlet, the union would hold a press conference to announce its findings or, alternatively, leak materials to a major U.S. newspaper. The campaign, Fernandez suggested, should culminate in a high level contact between the steelworkers and Bridgestone Firestone representatives. The Japanese government, he suggested, should also be looped into the campaign "so they can gauge some of the trade and international aspects of the actions of one of their biggest corporations."

Fernandez did not respond to requests for comment.

On Oct. 30, 1996, the union's corporate campaign department prepared a document that briefly explained the key findings from their investigation into the company's actions in Liberia during the civil war to present to Vice President Al Gore, who was visiting the Steelworkers headquarters in Pittsburgh. It is unclear whether Gore ever received the documents. Efforts to speak to Gore were not successful.

The next day, Oct. 31, the steelworkers entered into secret talks with Bridgestone Firestone. Soon, a deal was done, and then announced. As part of the agreement, the company agreed to rehire all workers dismissed during the strike and to give employees their first across-the-board raises since 1982 as well as partial back pay. In exchange, the union agreed to end the strike and its highly visible negative campaign against the company.

On the day of the announcement, Becker, the union president, called it a "historic day for the union and the entire labor movement," according to news reports at the time. For Firestone's Liberian workforce, the new accord would do nothing to help address their own grievances against the company, which included demands for better wages and back pay.

In September of 1997, less than a month after Taylor became president of Liberia, Firestone workers launched a strike on the rubber plantation. Taylor responded in typically harsh fashion, sending in police to quash the demonstration. According to the Associated Press, the police opened fire on the protestors and several strikers were killed.

"It was basically a police state during Taylor's time," said Edwin Cisco, vice president of the union representing Firestone workers in Liberia. "The government wasn't interested in labor standards."

Today, Bridgestone remains one of the largest manufacturers of tires and rubber products in the world. The company has, by and large, been able to avoid strikes in factories across the U.S. in recent years.

In Liberia, Firestone remains the largest taxpayer and private employer in Liberia. The company says that it offers some of the best wages and benefits in the region to the company's employees and their families, including free housing, subsidized food, paid time off and a pension. The company says that since 2004, it has injected more than $1 billion into the Liberian economy.

Firestone also recently revamped the Firestone Natural Rubber website, a kind of online history of the company that was largely silent on its role in the Liberian civil war. The site now includes a detailed defense of the company's actions.

In May 2013, the Firestone Agricultural Workers Union of Liberia and management signed to a three-year collective bargaining agreement. The contract expires at the end of the year.

Cisco commended Firestone management for addressing some of workers' concerns regarding wages, benefits, and living conditions.

Still, Cisco said, many Firestone rubber workers to this day find themselves forced to enlist family members to complete their daily workload on the plantation. He said union leaders intend to make that one of the issues in the next round of negotiations.

"These workers have to pay others who assist them out of their own pockets," Cisco said. "Firestone should be paying for that, not the workers out of their own pockets."

Help us investigate: If you have experience with or information about the United Steelworkers of America campaign or the Firestone companies dealings in Liberia, email t.christian.miller@propublica.org.

Related stories: For more coverage, read ProPublica's previous reporting on Firestone, Charles Taylor and Liberia's civil war.

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter.

_______________________
Help us investigate: If you have experience with or information about the United Steelworkers of America campaign or the Firestone companies dealings in Liberia, email t.christian.miller@propublica.org.
Related stories: For more coverage, read ProPublica's previous reporting on Firestone, Charles Taylor and Liberia's civil war.

Reprinted with permission from ProPublica

Republicans Call for Imposing ALEC Zones on Poorest Neighborhoods of Milwaukee

Sen. Alberta Darling and Rep. Dale Kooyenga.
Sen. Alberta Darling and Rep. Dale Kooyenga.
By Brendan Fischer
Two suburban Wisconsin lawmakers have unveiled an economic development plan for the lowest-income neighborhoods of Milwaukee, and their "solutions" for the Wisconsin communities hit hardest by deindustrialization come directly from a national right-wing playbook.

Rep. Dale Kooyenga (R-Brookfield) and Sen. Alberta Darling (R-River Hills) represent two of the wealthiest districts in Wisconsin and have no background in economic development, yet have proposed at 23-page plan targeting the majority-minority communities with the highest unemployment rates in the state -- and have done so without consulting any of the elected officials who actually represent the area.

"I don't understand how two suburban legislators can tell Milwaukee what they need without talking to Milwaukee legislators," said Sen. Nikiya Harris Dodd, a Democrat who represents Milwaukee. "It's really hurtful."

The plan promotes anti-union "right to work" zones, zero-corporate tax zones, and measures to turn public schools into for-profit charters, ideas promoted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).

The proposals come against the backdrop of four years of failed economic policies. The harsh prescription of tax breaks for the rich and cuts in services for the poor that Governor Walker promised would revitalize Wisconsin's economy and balance the budget have failed to do either. Wisconsin remains 32nd in the nation in new job growth and the state faces a $2.2 billion dollar deficit. In January 2014, Rep. Kooyenga promised the Wisconsin State Journal that Wisconsin's structural deficit would be gone by 2015.

These policies have contributed to record inequality in the state, according to the Wisconsin Budget Project. As members of the Joint Finance Committee, Sen. Darling and Rep. Kooyenga have been key architects of this agenda.

"It's Breathtaking to Hear the Double Talk from Sen. Darling"

The "New Opportunities for Milwaukee" plan isn't the first time that Sen. Darling has felt comfortable deciding what's best for the state's largest and most diverse city, without regard for what its residents think.

In 2011, after Scott Walker became governor and Republicans took control of the legislature, Darling was one of the principal sponsors of a bill to ban local governments from guaranteeing workers paid sick days in the name of "uniformity." The law was aimed squarely at Milwaukee, where voters had overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure allowing workers to earn paid sick days to take care of themselves or a family member who is ill. (The law was then shared at an ALEC meeting and similar bills subsequently spread across the country.)

"It's breathtaking to hear the double talk from Sen. Darling," said Ellen Bravo, Executive Director of Family Values @ Work, a coalition of groups advocating paid sick days and other family-friendly policies. "A local policy of paid sick days in Milwaukee, democratically enacted by 70% of the voters, was not OK because the state allegedly needs a uniform standard. Yet a local policy of so-called right-to-work in Milwaukee, undemocratically imposed by the state, is just fine," Bravo said.

"Seems contradictory," Bravo added, "until you realize both positions undermine local control, hurt workers and serve the interests of corporate lobbyists."

Local Anti-Labor Zones Likely to Prompt Costly Lawsuits

The proposal for targeted right to work legislation that applies only in Milwaukee is part of a new national push that is spearheaded by groups like the Heritage Foundation and a new ALEC offshoot, the American City County Exchange (ACCE).

So-called "right to work" laws allow non-union members to free-ride on union representation, reaping the benefits of negotiated wages and benefits but without paying the costs. According to a new report by the Economic Policy Institute, statewide right to work laws are associated with lower wages for both union and non-union workers and undermine the middle class.

Republican lawmakers in Wisconsin have long supported a statewide anti-union right to work law, and GOP leadership is debating whether to take up the measure this year. But the push for local right to work is part of a controversial multi-state effort that began just months ago.

In September of last year, the Washington Examiner reported that "Conservatives are starting to push the idea that city and county governments can pass union-restricting right-to-work laws, even though it may not be legal and has been tried only a handful of times in the last 70 years."

Although the federal National Labor Relations Act allows statewide laws, it prohibits local efforts, labor law experts say.

Nonetheless, in August of last year the Heritage Foundation issued a report making the case for local right to work laws, and hosted a panel discussion on the issue featuring representatives of ACCE, Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform, and the National Right to Work Legal Foundation.

Then, in December, the ACCE meeting in Washington, D.C. featured a workshop on local right to work, according to the New York Times, which reported that supporters of the effort would first try to pass the legislation in Kentucky, and then try their luck in Republican-controlled states that don't have a statewide right to work law--specifically naming Wisconsin as a target.

Indeed, that is precisely what has happened. Several Kentucky counties enacted local right to work laws throughout December and January. And with the Darling/Kooyenga proposal, Wisconsin could be next.

If such a provision is enacted for Milwaukee, it will almost certainly result in costly federal lawsuits challenging the laws as illegal under the National Labor Relations Act. Hardin County, Kentucky has already been sued over its law. (A nonprofit group called "Protect My Check" is offering to pay for the Kentucky counties' legal defense, but it is unclear whether a similar arrangement has been organized in Wisconsin.)

Jennifer Epps-Addison, Executive Director of Wisconsin Jobs Now, said that "not a single Milwaukee resident that I've heard from [in the areas targeted by the proposal] has asked for a right to work law. In fact, the only jobs in those zones that pay family-supporting wages are unionized," she said.

"If [Darling and Kooyenga] really wanted to address poverty, they would make it easier to unionize in places like McDonalds and Walmart, in the jobs that are already present in those areas," Epps-Addison said. Or, she said, they could support a $15/hour minimum wage, "which is the loudest call that I've heard from people here in Wisconsin and nationally."

Wisconsin Jobs Now has a petition asking Darling and Kooyenga to visit Milwaukee neighborhoods and actually talk to residents and get their opinions on how to reduce poverty, rather than imposing a national right-wing agenda on them.

"To impose these policies without consulting people in Milwaukee is disrespectful and disingenuous," Epps-Addison said.

Other Policies Lifted from Right-Wing Playbook

Another item in their proposal would accelerate the spread of charter schools in the targeted area, using proposals that track the ALEC education agenda. It calls for a "turnaround school model" that would convert public schools deemed "failing" into charters, which are often operated by for-profit providers. It would allow high-performing charter schools to create new charters without getting approval from charter school authorizers, injecting even less accountability into an already unaccountable system.

The legislators propose eliminating what they call "barriers to work" in the form of occupational licensing requirements--a solution drawn directly from the Koch-founded and -funded Institute for Justice. ALEC has adopted bills calling for an end to occupational licensing, and has also long pushed the notion that urban zones should serve as corporate tax havens. The ALEC Enterprise Zone Act establishes “zones in depressed areas that have reduced taxes” and no “government barriers to … profit.” That bill came out of the ALEC Commerce, Insurance and Economic Development Task Force, of which Darling is a member.

Notably, Sen. Darling is one of the state's most vocal proponents of ALEC-inspired voter ID laws, and both she and Kooyenga sponsored the state's 2011 law requiring an ID to vote. But strikingly, only half of eligible voters in the zip codes targeted by Darling and Kooyenga have valid driver's licenses. (In one of the zip codes, the number is closer to twenty percent). This means the pair have been actively working to disenfranchise the same people they now claim to be trying to help, advocates say.

No Train Manufacturers?

Ironically, the Darling/Kooyenga proposal says the fact that Milwaukee doesn't have an automobile or train manufacturing industry justifies their plan for a zero percent corporate tax. It specifically notes that good manufacturing employers like "A.O. Smith, later sold to Tower Automotive" are no longer providing family-supporting jobs in the area.

But in fact, until recently Milwaukee did have a burgeoning train manufacturing plant, in the old Tower Automotive facility--but it was killed by Governor Walker and legislative Republicans, including Sen. Darling and Rep. Kooyenga. Dave Cieslewicz tells the tale:

In 2009, then Gov. Jim Doyle joined forces with Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett to convince train manufacturer Talgo to locate in Milwaukee. The city of Milwaukee invested $10 million for site improvements at the old Tower Automotive plant in a neighborhood that needed the jobs and the reinvestment. Wisconsin ordered two trains for the state-sponsored Milwaukee to Chicago Hiawatha service. In addition, Talgo had an order for two trains for use in Oregon and Washington that would also be built in Milwaukee.

Then Doyle famously secured $810 million in federal stimulus money to build higher-speed rail from Chicago to Milwaukee to Madison with the promise of eventually connecting the line to the Twin Cities. And, of course, those train sets would have been built in Milwaukee too.

But in 2010, Scott Walker was elected governor and rejected the high-speed rail funds. Republicans in the legislature--Darling and Kooyenga included--cancelled the contract with Talgo, despite having already paid the company $52 million for the trains. The state could be on the hook for another $70 million in damages if Talgo's lawsuit against the state is successful.

Meanwhile, the Talgo factory is vacant. And the rail system that would have carried Milwaukee residents to jobs in the suburbs doesn't exist.


Reprinted with permission from PRWatch.

Don't Turn Your Back: New Yorkers Really Don’t Like the Way NYPD Officers Protested Mayor de Blasio — Survey

Composite photo of the police "turn your back" protest against NYC mayor de Blasio during the funeral for a officer Rafael Ramos.
Composite photo of the police "turn your back" protest against NYC mayor de Blasio during the funeral for officer
Rafael Ramos.

By Mark Berman
New Yorkers are pretty unhappy with the way police officers protested against Mayor Bill de Blasio at two recent police funerals. And while the city’s residents continue to support the police, a new poll shows that they believe any officers who deliberately made fewer arrests during a recent slowdown should be disciplined.

Nearly seven in 10 people in the city disapprove of the way police officers turned their backs on de Blasio at the recent police funerals, according to a Quinnipac University poll released Thursday.

Police officers turned their backs on de Blasio at the funerals for Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos, who were gunned down while sitting in their squad car last month. After the shooting, the tense relationship between de Blasio and the police became a very public rift that has only worsened.

De Blasio and William J. Bratton, the police commissioner, criticized these funeral protests last week. The mayor called them disrespectful to the mourning families, while Bratton said he was disappointed with “the selfishness” of the officers who ignored his request that they not to turn their backs at the second funeral.

New Yorkers agree. During a survey conducted between Jan. 7 and Jan. 14, they said they were against the funeral protests.

Read More

After NYPD Union Chief Confronts Mayor — He Faces Mutiny of His Own Dissident Cops (Video)


Out of control union head, Pat Lynch, now in a struggle to keep his job — and may deserve to lose.

Illustration by Ronald David Jackson.
Illustration by Ronald David Jackson.




_______________

Patrolmen's Benevolent Association head Patrick Lynch in for a fight to keep his job, and may deserve to lose

 

By Juan Gonzalez
Police union boss Patrick Lynch could soon be fighting for his own survival. Dissidents in the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association are preparing a campaign to unseat Lynch in the union’s June election — the first such challenge to his leadership since 2003.

“Pat does a lot of yelling and screaming, but there’s never a solution, and in the meantime the police officer’s life keeps getting worse,” one insurgent told the Daily News.

The group will unveil its opposition slate — including some of the PBA’s current leadership — later this month, a source said.

Lynch has been tossing verbal jabs at Mayor de Blasio ever since a Staten Island grand jury decided not to indict Officer Daniel Pantaleo in the July chokehold death of Eric Garner. After the Dec. 20 assassination of Officers Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu, Lynch recklessly charged their blood was on the mayor’s hands. And then, many suspect, he triggered a two-week arrest-and-summons slowdown by his members.

But fissures within the union are becoming apparent. First came the anemic response to a letter Lynch issued on the PBA website asking cops to bar the mayor and Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito from their funerals if they were killed on the job. Only 4% of cops have signed it, sources told The News.

Read More






Is the NYPD Virtually Useless?: Confirmed — Crime Down in First 12 Days of Year - NYPD 'Work Slowdown' Reduced Crime

NYPD Commissioner William Bratton. (Screen capture from NY1 Video)

By NY1 News
The slowdown is slowing down.

During a news briefing, NYPD Commissioner William Bratton said there are signs the police slowdown is ending.

[...]

We are still concerned with the levels of activity, but they are returning to normal with each passing day, each passing week. Those numbers are back up to what we describe as normal levels. At the same time, in every category, as I referenced to you housing, transit, in precincts in every borough in the city has experienced a crime decline in the first 12 days of this year.

Read More

The NYPD Slowdown Is Proving That ‘Broken Windows’ Is a Failure — Isn’t It Time to Drop It?

It should be harder for the New York City Police Department to go back to “business as usual” once it has resolved its issues with the mayor.




Photo by onnola.
Photo by onnola.
By Charles F. Coleman Jr.
The New York City Police Department continues its standoff with Mayor Bill de Blasio over his perceived lack of support, the conversation caused by the police slowdown is providing strong ammunition for critics of overly aggressive law-enforcement tactics within urban communities.

At this point, there has been no significant impact to public safety because of the slowdown—during which tickets and summons for minor offenses have dropped more than 90 percent—and we’ve seen anything but the doomsday crime spree that Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch seemed to hope might cause widespread fear among New Yorkers.

Lynch, who leads the NYPD’s largest and most influential union, has been very critical of de Blasio in past weeks, accusing him of expressing anti-policing sentiments in his remarks after the Staten Island grand jury’s nonindictment in the Eric Garner choke hold case.

Lynch’s inflammatory sentiments have intensified in the wake of the slaying of two NYPD officers in late December while they were on duty in Brooklyn. According to the New York Post, leaders of the five police unions have orchestrated what amounts to a work stoppage of NYPD officers (the PBA denies that the work stoppage is orchestrated). Still, the effect on the crime rate has been minimal. This strongly suggests that the NYPD’s typical over-policing—particularly within communities of color—is hardly as necessary as many have previously suggested.

In many ways, the slowdown is backfiring terribly and should force a bigger discussion about not only the need to revisit the “broken windows” approach to law enforcement in urban communities but also the age-old trend of funding America’s cities on the backs of the poor.

The broken-windows approach to law enforcement, which de Blasio endorsed during the early days of his tenure, is essentially Reaganomics’ trickle-down theory of policing. (Remember how well that worked out?) The idea is essentially that focusing on strict policing of smaller offenses will deter larger crimes from happening. However, the notion that police, by cracking down on low-level crimes like selling loose cigarettes and open containers, are going to deter hardened criminals is a dubious theory at best. This is, in part, because economics drives most real crime more than any other factor.  

Read More





Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...