Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text Alternative Text
Survivor of US Drone Attack:
Obama Belongs on List of World's Tyrants

Poisoning Black Cities: Corporate Campaign to Ethnically Cleanse US Cities Massive Marches in Poland
Against Authoritarian Threat of Far-Right
Ethiopia’s Invisible Crisis: Land Rights Activists Kidnapped and Tortured

Global Perspectives Now Global Perspectives Now
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Before There Was Social Media The Israeli Government Could Control The Narrative — So Now It Wants Censorship of Social Media


______________

Israel Eyes World Coalition to Force Social Media Platforms to Block Incitement


By David Shamah
Israel is aiming to build an international coalition to force the world’s leading social media giants to prevent their platforms from being abused to peddle incitement to terrorism.

The move, which was unveiled by Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan at Sunday’s cabinet meeting, aims at requiring Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and other social networks to take greater responsibility for such content.

While some experts consider the idea unworkable — arguing that the terms of service of such platforms protect them from any legal threat, and that the preventative measures Erdan wants to see introduced are not possible technologically, others say a coalition pushing for change could be effective, and certainly stands more of a chance than an effort led by Israel alone.

The social media giants “make millions but claim they are not responsible for content, and that they only provide a platform,” a spokesperson for Erdan told The Times of Israel. “That is not going to wash. We are planning to put a stop to this irresponsibility, and we are going to do it as part of an international coalition that has had enough of this behavior as well.”

On Sunday, Erdan introduced the idea of building an international legal coalition to take action against social media platforms if they do not proactively prevent the use of their systems to upload videos, songs, photos, and other content that inspire would-be terrorists to pick up knives, guns, rocks, and other weapons to attack Israelis.

Read More

Donald Trump Caught Pushing White Supremacy Again: Promoted a Nazi Twitter Account That Showed Him Gassing Bernie Sanders (A Jew)

There is something profoundly racist about Trump and the people that surround him.  A photo tweeted by an Twitter  account (@WhiteGenocideTM) promoted by Donald Trump. The photo has  since been taken down.
There is something profoundly racist about Trump and his staff.
A photo tweeted by a Twitter account (@WhiteGenocideTM) promoted by Donald Trump. The photo
has since been taken down.

By
GOP front runner Donald Trump has been accused of racism in the past, but on Friday morning, Trump retweeted a white supremacist website promoting Adolf Hitler.

The tweet was a jab at rival, Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and showed him looking down-and-out, holding a “Vote Trump” sign.
@WhiteGenocideTM: @realDonaldTrump Poor Jeb. I could’ve sworn I saw him outside Trump Tower the other day! pic.twitter.com/e5uLRubqla

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2016
The tweet originated from an account called @WhiteGenocideTM, which is promoting a pro-Hitler movie called, The Greatest Story Never Told. The trailer for the film calls Hitler the “saviour of Europe.” The website also includes an interview with Holocaust-denier Ursula Haverbeck.

One of the many troubling tweets from the account is an animated picture of Donald Trump dressed as a Nazi, about to gas potential Democratic rival Sen. Bernie Sanders. Sanders is Jewish.
@Perennialism @Ricky_Vaughn99 pic.twitter.com/C6PT2o1ex2

— Donald Trumpovitz (@WhiteGenocideTM) January 13, 2016
The Twitter account is littered with anti-Semitic and anti-Muslim rhetoric and lists its location as “Jewmerica.” Its “pinned” or featured tweet shows a man saying he is Jewish, with a yellow Star of David with the word “Jude” added on.

Trump tweeted the image of Bush with the racist twitter handle to his nearly 6 million followers Friday morning. It’s not the first time Trump has been associated with the fascist leader of Nazi Germany who was responsible for genocide against millions of Jewish people and other groups.

Read More

Twitter Warns Some Users of Possible 'Government' Hacking — Looking for IP Addresses, Emails, Phone Numbers, Etc


By Steven Musil
Twitter is warning some users that they may be the target of security breaches by "state-sponsored actors."

The microblogging service sent emails to an unknown number of users warning that hackers may be trying to obtain phone numbers, email addresses and IP addresses, according to Twitter users who have received the emails. The emails warn that while Twitter is not certain recipients' personal information was obtained, it has reason to believe they were intended targets."At this time, we have no evidence they obtained your account information, but we're actively investigating this matter," according to Coldhak, a Canada-based nonprofit organization that posted a copy of the letter it received on Twitter. "We wish we had more we could share, but we don't have any additional information we can provide at this time.

Read More


Cop Fired For 'Violent Threats' Against Black Lives Matter




By SiliconValleyNews
The San Jose Police Department has fired the officer who posted tweets against the Black Lives Matter movement.

Phillip White was fired because some of his tweets were viewed as violent threats.

Two tweets in particular were seen as threats, in which White wrote: “Threaten me or my family and I will use my God given and law appointed right and duty to kill you” and “By the way if anyone feels they can’t breathe or their lives matter I’ll be at the movies tonight, off duty, carrying my gun.”

Read More


Black Lives Matter Spied On By Corporate Security Firm — Lableled Them A 'Threat' and Recommended 'Action'

The report mentions the "security" corporation's "intelligence partners" based at the Fort Meade Army base. The report indicates that at least 249 activists and protesters were under surveillance by the corporation which was apparently hired by government officials.  Government organizations use private "security firms" to spy on citizens so the government can claim that it does not engage in such unconstitutional activities.


Peaceful organizers Johnetta Elzie (left) and DeRay Mckesson (who made several appearances on CNN) were both labeled as "high" severity, "physical," and "#mostwanted" threats. Black activists get far more scrutiny from government agencies and private "security firms" than the heavily armed and violent KKK, skinheads, white militias and other racist- supremacist groups. Private "security firms" are used to spy on Americans so the government can claim it does not spy on the legal political activities of its citizens.
Peaceful organizers Johnetta Elzie (left) and DeRay Mckesson (who made several appearances on CNN) were both labeled as "high" severity, "physical," and "#mostwanted" threats. Black activists get far more scrutiny from government agencies and private "security firms" than the heavily armed and violent KKK, skinheads, white militias and other racist- supremacist groups. Private "security firms" are used to spy on Americans so the government can claim it does not spy on the legal political activities of its citizens.

By
Documents from a "crisis management" report produced by the cybersecurity firm ZeroFox indicate that the firm monitored Black Lives Matter protesters during the Freddie Gray protests in Baltimore earlier this year. The documents, which surfaced online last Wednesday, also state that the firm "protected" the online accounts of Maryland and Baltimore officials and members of the Baltimore Police Department and Maryland National Guard.
RELATED STORY: America's Police State Moving To Get Police Brutality Protests 'Under Control'
___________


Harlem Suarez (left) allegedly expressed support for ISIS on Facebook and that was enough for the FBI to send provocateurs to trap him in a "terror plot" initiated by the FBI itself. Meanwhile Dylann Roof (right) was posting racist manifestos with this picture holding the pro-slavery battle flag on social media and he went untouched by the FBI's army  of social media watchers, informants and provocateurs, costing the lives of nine black church goers, including a member  of the South Carolina legislature.
Harlem Suarez (left) allegedly expressed support for ISIS on Facebook and that was enough for the FBI to send provocateurs to trap him in a "terror plot" initiated by the FBI itself. Meanwhile Dylann Roof (right) was posting racist manifestos with this picture holding the pro-slavery battle flag on social media and he went untouched by the FBI's army
of social media watchers, informants and provocateurs, costing the lives of nine black church goers, including a member
of the South Carolina legislature.
___________


The report identifies DeRay McKesson and Johnetta Elzie, two prominent Black Lives Matter organizers who took part in the Baltimore protests, as "threat actors" for whom "immediate response is recommended." It describes McKesson and Elzie as "high" severity, "physical," and "#mostwanted" threats and notes both have a "massive following" on social media. It says that ZeroFox was engaged in "continuous monitoring" of their social media accounts and specifies their geographical locations at the time of the report. The report does not suggest that the pair were suspected of criminal activity but were "main coordinators of the protests."

RELATED STORY: The FBI Is Literally Protecting Supremacists While Targeting Muslims: The Price? — The Lives of the Nine Blacks Killed by Dylann Roof

[...]

In emails exchanged in April, ZeroFox's CEO, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlins-Blake's chief of staff, and the president of the Maryland chapter of an FBI intelligence partnership program discussed ZeroFox's potential surveillance "help" for Baltimore. These emails were released to the Baltimore Sun last week following a public records request. The emails also indicate that ZeroFox "briefed our classified partners" at the Fort Meade Army base in Maryland on "intelligence" it had collected during the Gray protests. Other emails from the Baltimore Police Department indicate the department had collected "intelligence regarding potentially violent agitators."
RELATED STORY: Ferguson Protesters Are “Enemy Forces” — According to Missouri National Guard
The report on the Black Lives Matter organizers is dated the day after the Fort Meade briefing. It states that ZeroFox intended to "alert Baltimore PD on all monitoring threat actors and influencers." According to the leaked report, ZeroFox monitored 62 "threat actors" and 187 "threat influencers," including a Twitter user who was "a main local protest organizer" and another who was "sending supplies from New Jersey."

Read More

Brainwash The Internet: Spy Agency's Attempt to Induce Online "Conformity" and "Obedience" Exposed

Photo by Anonymous9000.
Photo by Anonymous9000.
By Jon Queally
With never-before-seen documents accompanied by new reporting on Monday, The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald and Andrew Fishman are offering a more in-depth look than ever into how a secretive unit of the UK's GCHQ surveillance agency used a host of psychological methods and online subterfuge in order to manipulate the behavior of individuals and groups through the internet and other digital forms of communication.

According to the reporting, the latest documents, which were leaked to journalists by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden,
Demonstrate how the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (JTRIG), a unit of the signals intelligence agency Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), is involved in efforts against political groups it considers “extremist,” Islamist activity in schools, the drug trade, online fraud, and financial scams.

Though its existence was secret until last year, JTRIG quickly developed a distinctive profile in the public understanding, after documents from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the unit had engaged in “dirty tricks” like deploying sexual “honey traps” designed to discredit targets, launching denial-of-service attacks to shut down internet chat rooms, pushing veiled propaganda onto social networks, and generally warping discourse online.
Among the most troubling revelations is a 42-page internal JTRIG memo that describes in detail how the elite unit developed, maintained, and apparently sought to expand its "scientific and psychological research into how human thinking and behavior can be influenced" in order to increase its ability to "manipulate public opinion" via online tools like email, social media, video, discussion forums, and other platforms.

Greenwald and Fishman argue JTRIG's self-documented exploits are most notable because of their "extensive use of propaganda methods and other online tactics of deceit and manipulation" that are not only reserved for "suspected foreign enemies" or criminals, as the agency continues to claim, but have also been used against other groups and individuals that the agency deems threatening or "politically radical."

As Common Dreams reported in February of 2014—when the existence of JTRIG was first made public—the GCHQ has used the unit to develop and deploy a complex series of "dirty tricks," "propoganda," and "false flag" operations designed to spy on selected targets who included not only "suspected terrorists" and "criminals" but also diplomats, journalists, and activists.

Included in the new JTRIG memo is this detailed look at the manipulative online tactics developed by the group:


The reporting also highlights the internal memo's focus on "manipulation" and how the GCHQ hoped to foster both "conformity" and "obedience" among those targeted:



______________


Behavioural Science Support for JTRIG’s
(Joint Threat  Research and Intelligence Group’s) Effects and Online
HUMINT Operations




Reprinted with permission from Common Dreams.

NATO's Creepy New Plan to Infiltrate Twitter and Facebook: To Combat ISIS? - No, To Combat Russia

NATO has announced that “countering false Russian narratives on social media” is a major priority. Here’s why you should be concerned

NATO wants to use 'sock puppet accounts to  counter what RT (Russian Television) is telling  the world about the goings on inside Ukraine.  (Photo by Rachel Glaves)
NATO wants to use "sock puppet" accounts to
counter what RT (Russian Television) is telling
the world about the goings on inside Ukraine.
(Photo by Rachel Glaves)
By Adam Johnson
On Sunday, NATO commander General Philip Breedlove said in an interview with the Associated Press that NATO must do more to “counter Russian propaganda online”:

NATO's supreme commander says the West must do more to counter Russia by employing a rapid-reaction approach to internet communications that counteracts Russia's "false narratives" spread on social media.

Gen. Philip Breedlove said Sunday that Vladimir Putin's Russia has been waging information warfare as part of its actions against Ukraine.

Breedlove said: "We need as a western group of nations or as an alliance to engage in this informational warfare. The way to attack the false narrative is to drag the false narrative into the light and expose it."

While details of such a plan remain vague, this mindset is part of a broader trend of social media psychological warfare that has been emerging largely unnoticed over the past five years. The first question that is rarely asked by our media is the most important one: what constitutes a “false narrative” and, just as importantly, who decides what constitutes one? Recent attempts by UK authorities to stifle the speech of the Russian-backed, English-language TV station RT show that false narratives are whatever Western governments determine they are.

According to The Guardian, "Russia Today is to be investigated by media regulator Ofcom over anti-western comments in a late-night discussion on Ukraine – its sixth ongoing inquiry into the Kremlin-backed news channel following complaints by viewers."That Western officials would extend this crackdown on Russian-backed narratives from traditional to social media is not surprising. What is worth noting is that the media routinely downplays or under-reports what such a plan would entail—namely, the use of sockpuppet or fake social media accounts that would be used to counter these
so-called false narratives.

Read More



Police State USA: Social Media Post Prompts Arrests for 'Terrorist' Threats Against Police

Police Arrests of Those Accused of Making On-line Threats Against Police Could Backfire — Drive Real Threats Deep Underground and Far Out of Site
—Ronald David Jackson

By Bryan Dyne
Arrests of people making allegedly “threatening” statements towards local police throughout the country have continued. A teenager in Fort Worth, Texas was arrested for posting a Twitter photo of a rifle pointed at a police vehicle. In Chicago, Illinois a man was arrested after Facebook posts led police to search the place where he was staying, where a gun and ammunition were found.

These arrests come after the fatal shooting of two police officers the weekend before Christmas. They are part of increased nationwide surveillance of social media, criminalizing the rights protected in the free speech clause of the First Amendment in the name of national, state and city “security.”

The latest arrests follow several last week, including in New York, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Massachusetts and Vermont. While all the details of the cases are not clear, they have the character of punitive arrests as part of a general sweep aimed at suppressing all forms of opposition against police and police violence.

According to police reports, 17-year-old Montrae Toliver was arrested on Monday for making a Twitter post depicting him pointing a gun at a patrol car with the caption, “Should I do it? They Don’t Care For a Black Male Anyways.”

He is now being charged with making a “terroristic threat” against police, which by state laws is a felony. His bail is set at $500. If convicted, Montrae Toliver could face 80 days to two years in a state jail and a fine of up to $10,000. So far there has been no indication that the fact that he is a minor will be taken into consideration.

Reuters reports that there is no lawyer for Toliver listed in online jail records.

Toliver has said that a previous Twitter post clearly showed that the rifle was in fact an Airsoft pellet gun. “It doesn’t matter that it wasn’t a real gun. It was a threat against an officer,” said police spokesperson Tracey Knight at a news conference Monday. “The threats are real, they are taken real and you will be found and arrested.”

In Chicago, Aries Woodfin was arrested after making a December 8 Facebook post where he allegedly said he would “kill cops and innocent white kids.” No specific time frame was indicated in the post, which is required for the legal definition of “threat.” Despite this, police then used the post to get a search warrant.

The charges against Woodfin are not related to his Facebook post. Using the fact that police found a .45-caliber pistol, spent bullet casings and a makeshift gun range in the basement of the house, he was charged in Cook County Criminal Court with illegal gun possession, a felony, along with misdemeanor charges of assault, failure to have a valid firearm owner’s identification card and disorderly conduct. He was ordered held without bond.

The person whose house was raided, Beatrice Franklin, is disputing the charges, saying that while Woodfin sometimes stayed at her house, it was not his home and that he didn’t own the weapons. “That gun that they found belonged to me,” Franklin said in comments to ABC7 Eyewitness News. “I am a licensed FOID card holder and I have paperwork stating that it’s mine. So no, it’s not his.”

“He was speaking his mind,” she said, referring to Woodfin’s anger at the decisions not to indict the killers of Eric Garner and Michael Brown. “He was expressing how he felt, which is what everyone else was doing on Facebook as well, expressing themselves. They were ranting and they were raving.”


Reprinted with permission from Center for Research in Globalization.

Twitter is About To Screw Up Twitter: Will Dumb Down Your Timeline With "Best Tweets" — Facebook-Like Algorithm Censorship Will TELL You What To Look At

Twitter Will Onboard Users With “Instant Timeline”, Show Best Tweets “While You Were Away”
Geek Dictatorship: Do we really need this dude deciding what's important and forcing it onto our timelines?
(Dick Costolo, Twitter CEO — Photo by TechCrunch)

NOTE: Facebook's algorithms has distorted the timelines of users. A post on a Facebook page may actually be seen by only 3 percent of the people who "liked" the page. Regular users may see only 5-7 percent of what's posted by friends -  the rest is garbage chosen by Facebook's algorithms. Facebook geeks have been accused of  "throttling" certain posts or "gaming" its news feed against certain pages: one user reported a 1,000 percent increase in interaction after paying to promote a post. This is the kind of nonsense Twitter's managers intend to force on users.—Ronald David Jackson


By

[...]

"One feature that might rile a few feathers is called “While you were away”. It looks at the best tweets from your network since you last opened Twitter, and puts them at the top of your timeline. The company says this is so “Everytime you open the Twitter app, you’ll see something great.” This marks a significant break from Twitter’s main timline as a purely reverse chronological feed. Twitter had experimented with with showing tweets favorited by people you follow, but this is a much more aggressive shift from and unfiltered feed to an algorithmically sorted one."

Read More







Saudi Arabia — America's Great MidEast Ally: Jails Lawyers 8 Years for Calling Justice System 'Retarded' On Twitter

Abdullah ibn Abdilazīz: "King" of Saudi Arabia.  (Illustration by DonkeyHotey)
Abdullah ibn Abdilazīz: "King" of Saudi Arabia.
(Illustration by DonkeyHotey)

By jonathanturley
Despite claims from the government (outside of Saudi Arabia) that it is seeking to modernize its legal system, the Sharia-based Saudi system continues to churn out abuses that shock the conscience. The latest victims are three lawyers who have been jailed for Tweets denouncing the Saudi court system — widely ridiculed by lawyers around the world as a medieval anachronism.

The lawyers observed that the Saudi legal system was “retarded.” For that insult, they were arrested and convicted of “disobeying the ruler” as well as undermining and slandering the judicial system. They have received sentences up to eight years. Notably, the court also banned them from using social media, traveling, or speaking to the media. It was the classic “bag and gag” approach of authoritarian regimes for those who exercise free speech.

Read More

Organizing 101: Don't Rely On Social Media, It's Owned By Corporate Fatcats — Get Contact Info From Protest Participants

You want a movement – every crowd, every meeting, every flashmob – you get those digits.

Photo by Martin Abegglen.
Photo by Martin Abegglen.
By Bruce Dixon, BAR
At a meeting I attended last weekend, a lady told me an inspiring story, but not as inspiring as it should have been.

In a social media exchange, somebody asked her if an event on the Ferguson murder was happening nearby. Probably not, she replied, and suggested the questioner put one together. She did just that, starting a Facebook page, and hawking it on Twitter and other social media platforms. With only a few days lead time, a couple hundred people showed up. They sang, they chanted, they felt the strength that only comes from connecting with others in a just cause. And they dispersed.

Did anybody pass out a sign in sheet, I asked? Did you get the digits of the folks that showed up? I asked this because getting those digits is the first lesson in organizing 101, it's what we did before anybody ever heard of social media. Back in the day if we got 4 people, or 40, or 400, we got those digits.

I also asked because Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Vine, causes.com, change.org and other social media platforms DO NOT give the organizers of petitions or events ANY of the contact information on the people you're supposedly “organizing” because the corporate social media business model ain't never been about helping YOU do good, it's about mapping the people you touch, the people you influence and who influence you so they can sell that to marketers.

All the social media platforms can and do manipulate their algorithms and hashtags for commercial purposes, and their systems are private property. If they wanted to squelch your political activism tomorrow, or just show you more cat videos, or if the people who turned out last time simply were not on Facebook or Twitter for a day or two, they might never know about the next meeting or demonstration or even the murder that prompted it.

The answer to my “did you get the digits” question was “no”. Nobody passed a petition, a sign-in sheet or volunteer cards. Nobody got anybody's email, phone numbers or the best times to call.

In fairness it's an easy mistake to make, but a costly one. Remember the Million Man March? Organizers remembered to pass the hat but didn't pass a sign-in sheet, so there was no Million Man Mailing List or phone tree. Talk about missed opportunities. Most Occupy encampments didn't take names or contact info either.

When you have an event, publicized by social media or the radio, like so many of the Troy Davis and Trayvon Martin and Ferguson and other happenings, and you don't get those digits you are completely at the mercy of Twitter, Facebook or the radio station to recontact those people. Radio is a great way to get a crowd, but you rarely have access. Also you may have noticed that whenever radio stations take the lead, they put the Al Sharptons or their local equivalents at the head of the crowd. If you don't want to listen to those guys, you gotta get your own list, so you can get your own crowd. Most people are not already affiliated with any existing organization. That's a piece of Organizing 101 as well.

I'm not saying don't use corporate social media or radio when you can get it. But take it from an old school organizer: if you're depending on Twitter, on Facebook, on corporate social media and the radio to get your crowd and you don't pass a petition, a sign in sheet to enable you to keep in direct touch, or have the most enthusiastic among them sign volunteer cards you ain't got no movement, because YOU cannot MOVE it, only they can, and only when, where and for as long as THEY want to.

You want a movement – every crowd, every meeting, every flashmob – you get those digits.

_____________________
Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report and a state committee member of the GA Green Party. He can be reached via this site's contact page, or at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com.


 Reprinted with permission from Black Agenda Report.

Social Media Censorship: Should Twitter, Facebook and Google Executives be the Arbiters of What We See and Read?




By Glenn Greenwald
There have been increasingly vocal calls for Twitter, Facebook and other Silicon Valley corporations to more aggressively police what their users are permitted to see and read. Last month in The Washington Post, for instance, MSNBC host Ronan Farrow demanded that social media companies ban the accounts of “terrorists” who issue “direct calls” for violence.

This week, the announcement by Twitter CEO Dick Costolo that the company would prohibit the posting of the James Foley beheading video and photos from it (and suspend the accounts of anyone who links to the video) met with overwhelming approval. What made that so significant, as The Guardian‘s James Ball noted today, was that “Twitter has promoted its free speech credentials aggressively since the network’s inception.” By contrast, Facebook has long actively regulated what its users are permitted to say and read; at the end of 2013, the company reversed its prior ruling and decided that posting of beheading videos would be allowed, but only if the user did not express support for the act.

[...]

In the digital age, we are nearing the point where an idea banished by Twitter, Facebook and Google all but vanishes from public discourse entirely, and that is only going to become more true as those companies grow even further. Whatever else is true, the implications of having those companies make lists of permitted and prohibited ideas are far more significant than when ordinary private companies do the same thing.

[...]

If you want these companies to suppress calls for violence, as Ronan Farrow advocated, does that apply to all calls for violence, or only certain kinds? Should MSNBC personalities be allowed to use Twitter to advocate U.S. drone-bombing in Yemen and Somalia and justify the killing of innocent teenagers, or use Facebook to call on their government to initiate wars of aggression? How about Israelis who use Facebook to demand “vengeance” for the killing of 3 Israeli teenagers, spewing anti-Arab bigotry as they do it: should that be suppressed under this “no calls for violence” standard?

A Fox News host this week opined that all Muslims are like ISIS and can only be dealt with through “a bullet to the head”: should she, or anyone linking to her endorsement of violence (arguably genocide), be banned from Twitter and Facebook? How about Bob Beckel’s call on Fox that Julian Assange be “assassinated”: would that be allowed under Ronan Farrow’s no-calls-for-violence standard? I had a long dialogue with Farrow on Twitter about his op-ed but was not really able to get answers to questions like these.

Read More

Social Media Sites Demonstrate Their Bigotry: War Criminals Among Israel's Military Allowed To Post While Hamas' Posts Get Deleted

Illustration provided by DigitalRalph.
Illustration provided by DigitalRalph.
By Max Schindler
With dueling Twitter hashtags, Facebook posts and YouTube channels, the Israeli Defense Forces and Hamas, the Palestinian militant group, are trading not just fire but also barbs over social media, in an attempt to win hearts and minds around the world. But Hamas, barred from certain platforms, faces additional challenges in the Internet war.

In this round of violence, the social media battle has become increasingly important. Israel’s ability to wage its campaign in Gaza depends on the level of international criticism it sustains. Public opinion in Europe, the United States, and the Middle East could determine whether the conflict drags on or is brought to a halt.

On Wednesday, Twitter suspended several accounts used by Hamas on Wednesday. One page, used by the organization's military-wing, Al Qassam Brigades (@qassamfeed), drew 15,000 followers. Tweets from @qassamfeed have been embedded and quoted in many Western news reports, including those filed by the BBC and The Guardian.

The link to @qassamfeed now reads, “Account suspended. The profile you are trying to read has been suspended.” (Here's a cached version of the account).

Twitter’s terms of service block use of the website to “a person barred from receiving services under the laws of the United States or other applicable jurisdiction.” Hamas is classified as a terrorist organization by the State Department, denying it access to American commercial products.

A Twitter spokesman defended the removal in an e-mail, writing that the company could not comment on specific accounts due to “privacy and security reasons,” but provided a link to its company policies, which lists the “violations that can lead to account suspension.”

The social network has previously shut down Hamas accounts, notably in 2012 during the last bout of Israel-Gaza fighting.

Facebook maintains a similar policy, and has deleted dozens of Hamas accounts due to American government restrictions.

Read More

Outspoken Mozambican Hip-Hop Artist Azagaia Is Appealing to Fans for Donations to Remove His Brain Tumour

Photo by Rita da Silva published on the page Ajuda O Mano Azagaia (Help Brother Azagaia) and used with permission. The campaign raised 10% of the funds for treatment on its first day.
Photo by Rita da Silva published on the page Ajuda O Mano Azagaia (Help
Brother Azagaia) and used with permission. The campaign raised 10% of the
funds for treatment on its first day.

By Dércio Ernesto Tsandzana, Translated by Janet Gunter
Mozambican rapper Edson da Luz, better known as Azagaia, has revealed on his social media accounts that he was diagnosed with a brain tumour. Some weeks ago, he suffered a strong epileptic attack and started to show behavior inconsistent with his personality, such as states of mental confusion and memory loss. Exams in Mozambique and South Africa confirmed a tumor on the left side of his brain.

If not operated on soon, the 30-year-old singer could die within two years. Considering the high cost of intervention in Mozambique and the probable wait time for surgery through the country's national health system, Azagaia was advised to continue treatment in India. Meanwhile, without financial resources to pay for the operation costing US $25,000, the musician is asking for contributions from his fans:
All that I want is to get the money for this operation in India, but always praying for a miracle. From the bottom of my heart, the miracle that I want to see happen, is that this tumor disappears as it appeared, that is, without them having to take a knife to my head.


Azagaia, whose name means spear, has won fans for challenging those in power and addressing social issues in his music. His lyrics have caught the attention of government officials, too; in 2008, he was called in for questioning at the attorney general's office related to his music allegedly inciting violence.

Fans reacted by sharing the Facebook post by his management over 700 times on Monday, Aug. 25. They left numerous messages for the singer in the comment thread. Many, like Moises Jesus Alberto, demonstrated their unconditional support for the rapper:
Brother Azagaia have faith the people are with you, you are a source of inspiration for many young people, including me
Marcelo Massaite Jossias wrote:
Mozambique is with you, I am sure that many do not need to go to church to pray for you, but as soon as they hear of your condition they will ask God every minute to help you. We are with you bro.
 Edgar Kamikaze Barroso shared a video of support for Azagaia on his wall:
Spread the message if you can. At the end of the video there are bank account details and contact details if you need any extra information.
An equal number of messages of support appeared on Twitter:
I was speechless and sad at the same time with Azagaia's video
Let's help Azagaia. A little or a lot let's help.
Solidarity with Azagaia, the voice of the voiceless.
A Facebook page called Ajuda O Mano Azagaia (Help Azagaia) already has 3,300 likes. The crowdfunding campaign Azagaia Brain Tumor Operation Fund has reached US $5,724 with 10 percent of the goal donated on the first day alone.


Reprinted with permission from Global Voices.

Twitter Considers Further Censorship After Daughter of Recently Deceased Comedian Robin Williams Gets 'Bullied'

Zelda Williams. (Photo by Pop Culture Geek)
How can anyone be 'bullied' on Twitter, when it's possible to simply block or ignore any user? Is this another example of 'special treatment' for the rich, famous, and powerful?  And how exactly does Twitter intend to 'police' it's users?


By Kirthana Ramisetti
Twitter is reviewing its policies after Robin Williams’ daughter quit her social media accounts this week.

Zelda Williams announced Wednesday that she would no longer use Twitter and Instagram after receiving cruel messages about her father, who committed suicide Monday.

CNN reports that Twitter has responded by releasing a statement vowing not to “tolerate abuse of this nature” on its site.

"This includes expanding our policies regarding self-harm and private information, and improving support for family members of deceased users."

The 25-year-old initially fought back against her online bullies, including asking others to report anonymous users who sent her belittling messages and Photoshopped pictures of her father, according to Us Weekly.

Read More

Trinidadians Stood in Solidarity With Gaza on Twitter, on TV and on the Streets

Trinidad and Tobago Muslims gather in the Queen's Park Savannah on 1 August, 2014  in support of the people of Gaza. Photo posted on Trinidad and Tobago Muslims Facebook page.
Trinidad and Tobago Muslims gather in the Queen's Park Savannah on 1 August, 2014
in support of the people of Gaza. Photo posted on Trinidad and Tobago Muslims
Facebook page
.

By Jason Nathu
As protests continue throughout the world in support of the people of Gaza, netizens in the Caribbean nation of Trinidad and Tobago have also been showing their solidarity with Palestinians. Messages of support, disgust, shock and horror have popped up on Twitter from concerned Trinidad and Tobago nationals.

Among them, veteran journalist Ira Mathur noted that the collapse of the ceasefire on 1 August, 2014, seemed like an act of ‘ethnic cleansing':
At least 1,865 Palestinians have been killed and more than 9,500 injured since Israel launched a massive assault against the 40-kilometer long coastal strip on July 8. Seventy-five percent of Palestinians killed in this offensive have been civilians.

Israel says it is targeting Hamas, a group that has ruled Gaza since 2007 under a seven-year blockade from Israel, for firing hundreds of rockets across the border into Israel. Since the offensive started, three civilians have been killed in rocket attacks on Israel and 64 Israeli soldiers have been killed in fighting in Gaza.

Wikileaks released documents on 2 August that suggest Israel is deliberately using “disproportionate force upon any village that fires upon Israel” in Gaza, and Israeli authorities “intend to keep the Gazan economy functioning at the lowest level possible consistent with avoiding a humanitarian crisis.”

Many others have been posting similar sentiments. Writer Dylan Kerrigan posted about the perceived bias in media coverage in favour of the Israelis:
Israel and Hamas agreed to a 72-hour humanitarian ceasefire on 1 August so Gazans could bury their dead, take care of their injured, and restock food supplies. The ceasefire was violated after 90 minutes in the town Rafah where shelling killed dozens of Palestinians and injured hundreds more.

Israel and the U.S. blamed Hamas for breaking the ceasefire by capturing a soldier after the ceasefire, but 48 hours later said the soldier was never captured and was actually killed in combat. Hamas’ militant wing maintains they engaged with Israel soldiers in Rafah before, not after, the ceasefire.

Another poster pointed to the continuous killing of children in Gaza:
On 1 August, concerned citizens staged a peaceful demonstration in solidarity with the Palestinian people:
One local broadcaster, the Islamic Broadcast Network, hosted a ‘Telethon for Gaza’ on 27 July, to assist in the relief effort.

Screenshot Of IBN TV8 Telethon for Gaza on 27 July, 2014. Photo by Jason Nathu  with permission.
Screenshot Of IBN TV8 Telethon for Gaza on 27 July, 2014. Photo by Jason Nathu
with permission.
On Facebook, several local pages have been established in the past few weeks to highlight this issue. “Trinidad Muslims – Free GAZA” has been posting images of the casualties of the conflict, while United Voices For Humanity has been keeping netizens up-to-date on local solidarity efforts.


Reprinted with permission from Global Voices.

Kuwait—the Gulf's Poster Child of Democracy—Strips Opposition Members of Citizenship

US military rehearses for a parade in Kuwait in 2011. (Photo by DVIDSHUB)

By Noor Mattar
The Kuwaiti Cabinet revoked the Kuwaiti citizenship of two pro-opposition members and their families on July 21. This development rings serious alarm bells across the region, as Kuwait is often cited as the most democratic state in the Gulf region.

The move follows a threat by the government last week that it will take all necessary procedures against those suspected of trying to “destabilize” the country in the wake of protests which erupted last month demanding the release of Kuwait opposition and former National Assembly member Musallam Albarrak. He has since been released on bail.

The root of this saga goes to events that took place a few months ago, when Albarrak gave an hour long speech at a gathering where he made allegations of rigged elections, coup attempts and government corruption that led to billions of dollars of public money being wasted. Documents that support his claims were leaked in what some called “Kuwaitgate”. Among the documents were details of money transfers to a few judges, which led to a lawsuit being lodged against Albarrak for insulting the judiciary.

On July 2, @BarlamanNews a Twitter account that publishes news about Kuwait tweeted to its 17.3K followers this breaking news:

النيابة العامة تأمر بحجز مسلم البراك في الشكوى المقدمة من رئيس مجلس القضاء الأعلى.

— Barlaman News (@BarlamanNews) July 2, 2014

The public prosecution office orders the arrest of Musallam Albarak in the complaint filed against him by the head of the Supreme Judicial Council

Since then Kuwait witnessed a series of protests and confrontations that were closely followed and documented on social media, particularly Twitter.

POMED (Project on Middle East Democracy) issued a statement and tweeted:

#Kuwait More than 2,000 march in protest following arrest of opposition leader in Kuwait http://t.co/Vt0ZjhDJrP

— POMED (@POMEDwire) July 7, 2014

Albarrak was released on bail following those protests but many others were detained for protesting.

pic.twitter.com/j8G8UA77Vc مسلم البراك محمولاً على الأكتاف من قٌبل أنصاره في دوار الكرامه بعد الإفراج عنه بكفالة مالية ظهر اليوم .

— بدر فالح العنزي (@baderfaleh2) July 7, 2014

Musalam Albarak raised above the shoulders of his supporters in Alkaramah roundabout after his release on bail this afternoon

The government said last week that it will strike with an “iron fist” to defend the state's “prestige” and commissioned the Interior Ministry to take all necessary measures to fulfill the royal commands. (Details in this AlRai newspaper article in Arabic)

Among those named in the decision to revoke their nationalities is an opposition former MP Abdullah al-Barghash and three members of his family.

The government also revoked the nationality of Ahmad al-Shemmeri, owner of the independent Al-Youm television station and Alam Al-Yawm newspaper. His newspaper was ordered to temporarily shut down twice this year by a court for defying a prosecutor-ordered media blackout about an investigation into claims of the attempted coup that Albarak spoke about in one of his speeches. With his nationality revoked, it is expected that the channel and newspaper will be ordered to be shutdown as well.

The action raised concern all over the Gulf. Bahraini journalist Faisal Hayyat tweeted:

لماذا تسحب الجنسية؟ وأين القانون عندما يتوجب محاسبة أي مخالف؟ سحب الجنسيات عجز وابتزاز وإرهاب #مي_مقبولة #البحرين #الكويت #السعودية #GCC

— رياضيونا رهائن (@FaisalHayyat) July 21, 2014

Why would a nationality be revoked? Where are the laws if any dissident should be held accountable? Revoking nationalities is terrorism and blackmail. It speaks of helplessness

Saudi former journalist who turned academic Dr Omar Ualymany tweeted:

قضية سحب الجنسيات تتفاعل فى الكويت..وتهدد كيان المجتمع الكويتى ..

— Dr.Omar (@ualymany) July 22, 2014

The case of revoking nationalities in Kuwait stirs reactions and threatens the structure of the Kuwaiti community

Twitter user abo3asam, who has more than 113K followers, noted:


هم يترقبون ردود الفعل، فإذا أرعبك اليوم سلاح #سحب_الجناسي وسكت خوفاً سوف يسلبون منك غدًا حقوق إنسانية أكبر من حق المواطنة.

— أبوعسم (@abo3asam) July 21, 2014

They're anticipating your reactions so if today they scare you by revoking nationalities and you remained silent, tomorrow they will take away from you rights that are bigger than citizenship

Kuwait is an oil rich country, where individual income is among the highest worldwide. It is considered the most politically developed state in the Gulf. Therefore such developments are important and ring serious alarm bells because as blogger Ahmed Alomran tweets to his 85.5k followers:

Kuwait highlights a new reality: Arab citizens demanding rights simply on the basis of being entitled to those rights http://t.co/UMAn3TSuVV

— Ahmed Al Omran (@ahmed) July 6, 2014

___________________
  


Reprinted with permission from Global Voices.

Three Anti-World Cup Activists Accuse Brazil of Political Persecution, Unsuccessfully Seek Asylum From Uruguay

“Lawyer Eloisa Samy, politically persecuted Brazilian asylum seeker at the Consulate  of Uruguay. We are all persecuted”
“Lawyer Eloisa Samy, politically persecuted Brazilian asylum seeker at the Consulate
of Uruguay. We are all persecuted”


By Raphael Tsavkko Garcia
Brazil traded a military dictatorship for democracy nearly 30 years ago, but some are accusing the country, fresh off hosting the World Cup, of creating political refugees all the same.

The Uruguayan consulate in Brazil has denied a request for asylum from three Brazilians who are accused of “forming an armed gang” related to anti-World Cup protests and wanted for arrest based on what activists and alternative media are calling false evidence.

The day before the final match, police “preemptively” arrested 28 people opposed to hosting the tournament in Brazil because the activists had participated in past protests and police suspected they would engage in violent acts during a demonstration scheduled during the final.

Eloisa Samy, a lawyer who has defended imprisoned activists since anti-government protests rocked Brazil in June 2013, was one of those arrested on July 12. Formal charges weren't filed, and on July 15, most of the group, including Samy, were released after filing a habeas corpus petition.

Three days later, police, who said they had been investigating the activists since September 2013, turned over their 2,000-page investigation to the public prosecutor's office. In less than two hours after receiving it, the office filed charges of forming an armed gang against 23 activists, citing a bus arson and an attempt to set the Rio de Janeiro city council on fire.

Lucas Sada of the Institute of Human Rights Defenders criticized the public prosecutor's speed:

This incredible speed with which the complaint was submitted and received by Justice only reinforces that there is clear movement among the powers for the criminalization of the groups

Moreover, the activists are accused of supporting or being part of the Black Blocs, a protest tactic of wearing black clothing and covering the face with a mask or bandanna seen at demonstrations since 2013. Some protesters dressed this way have vandalized property or committed arson.

They have denied engaging in any violence or belonging to the Black Blocs. Journalist Igor Natusch pointed out on Twitter that Brazilian authorities appear to confused the tactic for some sort of organized group:

In private, a friend jokes: Brazil is the first country in the world to treat Black Bloc as an organization and not method. What depressing pioneering

Sketches of some of the activists who have been jailed since June 2013.
Sketches of some of the activists who have been jailed since June 2013.

Samy, her son David Paixão and his girlfriend Camila Nascimento were ordered arrested. The three sought refuge in the Uruguayan consulate in Rio de Janeiro on July 21, saying that they were facing political persecution. The defense lawyers of those arrested have found it difficult to access the proceedings, including Judge Siro Darlan, who released many of the activists after the preemptive arrests.

Once authorities realized the three were there, military police arrived and tried to enter the consulate. An employee prevented their entry in what could have become a serious diplomatic incident, according to Idelber Avelar, a professor at Tulane University in New Orleans:

Eloisa is now in the Consulate of Uruguay in Rio de Janeiro (Praia de Botafogo, 201), which the military police tried to break in — something that didn't even happen during the military dictatorship.

“The state intends to prosecute me because of my activism as a lawyer in popular protests.  Most likely the prosecution will be to link me to a criminal organization.” -Eloisa Samy on  21 April, 2014.
“The state intends to prosecute me because of my activism as a lawyer in popular protests.
Most likely the prosecution will be to link me to a criminal organization.” -Eloisa Samy on
21 April, 2014.

The Institute of Human Rights Defenders reported that military police with motorcycles surrounded the building while the three were inside.

In a video posted on YouTube with English subtitles, Samy denounces her situation and the situation of all the others who she calls “political prisoners” and asks for amnesty:



The Collective Mariachi interviewed her inside the consulate as well as lawyer Rodrigo Mondego from the Human Rights Committee of the Bar Association. In the video, Samy says that one of the reasons that led her to seek asylum in Uruguay was the story of its president, Pepe Mujica, who spent seven years in solitary confinement as a political prisoner during the dictatorship of his country:




On the evening of the same day, the Consul of Uruguay Myriam Fraschini Chalar denied them asylum. Journalist Fernando Rodrigues posted on his blog the official position of the Foreign Ministry of Uruguay, sent to him:

In [Brazil] there's a rule of law, [it] does not persecute anyone for political reasons, and Uruguay does not interfere in judicial decisions.

The decision was criticized by international law professor Daisy Ventura on her Facebook and Twitter account:

Como comentei ontem, qualquer decisão do Uruguai seria criticada. Mas a resposta do governo, se de fato foi esta, é muito infeliz.

— Deisy Ventura (@Deisy_Ventura) 22 julho 2014
As I commented yesterday, any decision of Uruguay would be criticized. But the government's response, if indeed this is it, is very unfortunate.
Brazil is a democracy, an asylum wouldn't fit. Have you forgotten [Julian] Assange? Does anyone think that England is not a democracy? And when Brazil hosted a Bolivian senator for about a year in its mission in La Paz, did [Brazil] intend to question the Executive or the Judiciary of Bolivia? Of course not, because [Bolivian President Evo] Morales is a political ally of the Brazilian government.

Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was granted asylum from Ecuador in 2012. He is wanted in Sweden on sexual assault charges, but fears he will be extradited to the U.S. because of his site's release of state secrets, so he has remained in Ecuador's London consulate.

Former Bolivian Senator Roger Pinto Molina was one of the main opposition members to the government of Bolivian President Evo Morales. Molina, who was accused of a litany of crimes including corruption by the government, he sought and was granted asylum from Brazil in June 2012 claiming he was politically persecuted. But Bolivia refused to allow him passage out of the country, so he lived in the Brazilian embassy in La Paz for a year. Then, Molina received the help of the temporary ambassador Eduardo Saboia to escape, creating a major diplomatic incident.

According to various media sources, Samy, her son and her son's girlfriend escaped the consulate with the help of Deputy Janira Rock of the Socialism and Freedom Party (PSOL), who accompanied them throughout the day there. Their current whereabouts are unknown.

Activists like professor Eduardo Sterzi soon pointed fingers at who they thought was the responsible for persecuting the 23 activists in Rio:

Immense sadness for our rulers who pushed us back to that rotten time [of dictatorship]. Huge shame to have voted all my life for the PT [Workers Party], one of the main parties responsible for the criminalization of political protesters.

On Twitter, others were also critical of President Dilma Rousseff and her PT government:

Agora o autoritarismo do governo Dilma é de conhecimento internacional, com presos políticos pedindo asilo em consulados. Vivi pra ver.

— Mauricio Caleiro (@M_Caleiro) 21 julho 2014

Now the authoritarianism of the Dilma government is internationally known, with political prisoners seeking asylum in consulates. I lived to see this.

A ex-presa-política @dilmabr e seu @JusticaGovBR vão se manifestar quando do pedido de asilo político em plena “democracia”? #EloisaSamy

— Daniel Nascimento (@dgcnascimento) 21 julho 2014

Will ex-political prisoner Dilma Rousseff and her Ministry of Justice speak on the request for political asylum in full “democracy”? #EloisaSamy

On July 24 judge Siro Darlan granted an habeas corpus for all the refugees and political prisoners.

___________
 


Reprinted with permission from Global Voices.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...