 |
"The saddest fact I've learned is nobody matters less to our society than young black women. Nobody."
(Jim DeRogatis)
"One white girl in Winnetka and the story would have been different."
(Mark Anthony Neal) |
By Jessica Hopper
It has been nearly 15 years since music journalist Jim DeRogatis caught
the story that has since defined his career, one that he wishes didn't
exist: R. Kelly's sexual predation on teenage girls. DeRogatis, at that
time the pop-music critic at the
Chicago Sun-Times, was
anonymously delivered the first of two videos he would receive depicting
the pop star engaging in sexual acts with underage girls. Now the host
of the syndicated public radio show
Sound Opinions and a professor at Columbia College, DeRogatis, along with his former
Sun-Times
colleague Abdon Pallasch, didn't just break the story, they did the
only significant reporting on the accusations against Kelly,
interviewing hundreds of people over the years, including dozens of
young women whose lives DeRogatis says were ruined by the singer.
This past summer, leading up to Kelly's headlining performance at the Pitchfork Music Festival, DeRogatis posted a
series of discussions about Kelly's career, the charges made against him, and sexual assault. He published a
live review
of the singer's festival set that was an indictment of Pitchfork and
its audience for essentially endorsing a man he calls "a monster." In
the two weeks since Kelly released his latest studio album,
Black Panties, the conversation about him and why he has gotten a pass from music publications (not to mention feminist sites such as
Jezebel)
has been rekindled, in part because of the explicit nature of the album
and also because of online arguments around the Pitchfork performance.
I was one of those people who challenged DeRogatis and was even flip
about his judgment -- something I quickly came to regret. DeRogatis and I
have tangled -- even feuded on air -- over the years; yet, amid the
Twitter barbs, he approached me offline and told me about how one of
Kelly's victims called him in the middle of the night after his
Pitchfork review came out, to thank him for caring when no one else did.
He told me of mothers crying on his shoulder, seeing the scars of a
suicide attempt on a girl's wrists, the fear in their eyes. He detailed
an aftermath that the public has never had to bear witness to.
 |
Some have suggested that this album cover is R. Kelly's way
of thumbing his nose at allegations of child sex abuse. |
DeRogatis offered to give me access to every file and transcript he
has collected in reporting this story -- as he has to other reporters
and journalists, none of whom has ever looked into the matter, thus
relegating it to one man's personal crusade.
I thought that last fact merited a public conversation about why.
In this interview (which has been condensed significantly), DeRogatis
speaks frankly and explicitly about the many disturbing charges against
Kelly and says, ultimately, "The saddest fact I've learned is nobody
matters less to our society than young black women.
Nobody."
Refresh our memories. How did this start for you?
Being a beat reporter, music critic at a Chicago daily, the
Sun-Times,
R. Kelly was a huge story for me, this guy who rose from not graduating
from Kenwood Academy, singing at backyard barbecues and on the El, to
suddenly selling millions of records. I interviewed him a number of
times. Then
TP2.com came out. I'd written a review that said
the jarring thing about Kelly is that one moment he wants to be riding
you and then next minute he's on his knees, crying and praying to his
dead mother in Heaven for forgiveness for his unnamed sins. It's a
little weird at times. It's just an observation.
The next day at the
Sun-Times, we got this anonymous fax --
we didn't know where it came from. It said: R. Kelly's been under
investigation for two years by the sex-crimes unit of the Chicago
police. And I threw it on the corner of my desk. I thought,
"player-hater." Now, from the beginning, there were rumors that Kelly
likes them young. And there'd been this
Aaliyah thing --
Vibe
printed, without much commentary and no reporting, the marriage
certificate. Kelly or someone had falsified her age as 18. There was
that. So all this is floating in the air. This fax arrives and I think,
"Oh, this is somebody playing with this." But there was something that
nagged at me as a reporter. There were specific names, specific dates,
and those great, long Polish cop names. And you're not going to make
that
crap up. So I went to the city desk and I asked, "What do we do with
this?" They said, Abdon Pallasch is the courts reporter, why don't you
two look into it and see if there's anything there? And it turns out
there had been lawsuits that had been filed that had never been
reported.
_______________
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES COVERAGE AND COURT DOCUMENTS
Document 01 Document 02 Document 03 Document 04 Document 05
Document 06 Document 07 Document 08 Document 09 Document 10
Document 11 Document 12 Document 13 Document 14 Document 15
Document 16
_______________
When you cover the courts in Chicago or any city, you go twice a day
and you go through the bin of cases that have been filed and every once
in a while Michael Jordan's been sued or someone went bankrupt and it's
this sexy story and you pull it out. These suits had been filed at 4
p.m. on Christmas Eve. Ain't no reporter working at 4 p.m. on Christmas
Eve, and they flew under the radar. So we had these lawsuits that were
explosive and we didn't understand why nobody had reported them.
Explosive in what regard?
They were stomach-churning. The one young woman, who had been 14 or
15 when R. Kelly began a relationship with her, detailed in great
length, in her affidavits, a sexual relationship that began at Kenwood
Academy: He would go back in the early years of his success and go to
Lina McLin's gospel choir class. She's a legend in Chicago, gospel
royalty. He would go to her sophomore class and hook up with girls
afterward and have sex with them. Sometimes buy them a pair of sneakers.
Sometimes just letting them hang out in his presence in the recording
studio. She detailed the sexual relationship that she was scarred by. It
lasted about one and a half to two years, and then he dumped her and
she slit her wrists, tried to kill herself. Other girls were involved.
She recruited other girls. He picked up other girls and made them all
have sex together. A level of specificity that was pretty disgusting.
Her lawsuit was hundreds of pages long, and Kelly countersued. The
countersuit was, like, 10 pages long: "None of this is true!" We began
our reporting. We knocked on a lot of doors. The lawsuits, the two that
we had found initially, had been settled. Kelly had paid the women and
their families money and the settlements were sealed by the court. But
of course, the initial lawsuits remain part of the public record.
So her affidavit, this testimony -- it's all public record?
To this day, any reporter who so cares can go to Cook County and pull
these records, so it drives me crazy, even with some of the
eloquent reconsiderations
we've seen of Kelly in recent days, that they keep saying "rumors" and
"allegations". Well, "allegations" is fair, OK. You're protected as a
reporter, any lawsuit that has been filed as fact. The contents of the
lawsuit are protected. So these were not rumors. These were allegations
made in court.
Do you think part of how it's been handled and why it's been
under-reported is that music writers may not know how to deal with it in
a journalistic sense?
Let's start with the most mundane part. A lot of people who are
critics are fans and don't come with any academic background, with any
journalistic background, research background. Now, nobody knows
everything, and far be it from me to say you've got to be a journalist
or you have to have studied critical theory in the academy. Part of what
we do is
journalistic. Get the names right, get the dates
right, get the facts right. Sometimes, on a very rare number of stories,
there's a deeper level of reporting required.
There's another reason: People are squeamish. I think a lot of people
don't know how to do it, don't care to do it, and it's way too much
work. It's just kind of disgusting to have to write about this and bum
everyone out when you just want to review a record.
You and I got into it over Twitter around Pitchfork, in part
over the fact that you were saying, "If you are enjoying R. Kelly, you
are effectively cosigning what this man has done." At the time, I was
being defensive, saying people can like what they like.
To be clear, I think Pitchfork was cosigning it. I think each and
every one of us, as individual listeners and consumers of culture, has
to come up with our own answer. I don't think there's a right or wrong
answer. The thing that's interesting to me is that Pitchfork is a
journalistic and critical organ. They do journalism and they do
criticism. And then when they are making money to present an act --
that's a cosign, that's an endorsement. That's not just writing about
and covering it. They very much wanted R. Kelly as their cornerstone
artist for the festival. I think it's fair game to say: "Why,
Pitchfork?"
CONTINUE READING...